• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
1 Jenia Tevelev
1 Jenia Tevelev

1 Homework 1
1 Homework 1

PART I. THE REAL NUMBERS
PART I. THE REAL NUMBERS

... an ordered field, is not complete. For example, the set T = {r ∈ Q : r < 2} is bounded above, but T does not have a rational least upper bound. The Archimedean Property THEOREM 4. (The Archimedean Property) The set N of natural numbers is unbounded above. Proof: Suppose N is bounded above. Let m = s ...
Mat 247 - Definitions and results on group theory Definition: Let G be
Mat 247 - Definitions and results on group theory Definition: Let G be

On separating a fixed point from zero by invariants
On separating a fixed point from zero by invariants

... Let G be a linear algebraic group over an infinite field k of any characteristic and let X be an algebraic variety over k on which G acts. Then G acts naturally on the ring of functions k[X] by g(f ) := f ◦ g −1 for f ∈ k[X] and g ∈ G. The ring of fixed points of this action is denoted by k[X]G and ...
12. Polynomials over UFDs
12. Polynomials over UFDs

From Geometry to Algebra - University of Illinois at Chicago
From Geometry to Algebra - University of Illinois at Chicago

... important geometrical theorems’. That is, we argue that some uses of ‘continuity’ or more precisely Dedekind completeness in Hilbert’s development were unnecessary. For example, Dedekind √ (page√22 of √ [11]) writes ‘ . . . in this way we arrive at real proofs of theorems (as, e.g. 2 · 3 = 6), which ...
Posets 1 What is a poset?
Posets 1 What is a poset?

... subset of X × X. We can represent R by a matrix with rows and columns indexed by X, with (x, y) entry 1 if (x, y) ∈ R, 0 otherwise. The term “poset” is short for “partially ordered set”, that is, a set whose elements are ordered but not all pairs of elements are required to be comparable in the orde ...
Usha - IIT Guwahati
Usha - IIT Guwahati

High School Math 2 Unit 1: Extending the Number System
High School Math 2 Unit 1: Extending the Number System

... Perform arithmetic operations on polynomials.  A.APR.1 Understand that polynomials form a system analogous to the integers, namely, they are closed under the operations of addition, subtraction, and multiplication; add, subtract, and multiply polynomials. Interpret the structure of expressions.  A ...
Math 1311 – Business Math I
Math 1311 – Business Math I

2-6 – Fundamental Theorem of Algebra and Finding Real Roots
2-6 – Fundamental Theorem of Algebra and Finding Real Roots

Non-standard number representation: computer arithmetic, beta
Non-standard number representation: computer arithmetic, beta

... for dividers in base 4 with digits in {−3, . . . , 3}, and computations on elliptic curves, see [33]. Another widely used representation is the so-called carry-save representation. Here the base is β = 2, and the alphabet of digits is D = {0, 1, 2}. Addition of a representation with digits in D and ...
HYPERELLIPTIC JACOBIANS AND SIMPLE GROUPS U3 1
HYPERELLIPTIC JACOBIANS AND SIMPLE GROUPS U3 1

... coincides with the center Z(G) which is either trivial or a cyclic group of order 3 depending on whether (3, q + 1) = 1 or 3. In both cases we get an embedding G0 := G/Z(G) = U3 (q) = PSU3 (Fq ) ⊂ GL8 (Fq2 ). If m = 2 (i.e., q = 4), then G = SU3 (F4 ) = U3 (4) and one may use Brauer character tables ...
MAXIMAL AND NON-MAXIMAL ORDERS 1. Introduction Let K be a
MAXIMAL AND NON-MAXIMAL ORDERS 1. Introduction Let K be a

Algebraic Methods
Algebraic Methods

... of n variables is acted on by all n! possible permutations of the variables and these permuted functions take on only r values, then r is a divisior of n!. It is Galois (1811-1832) who is considered by many as the founder of group theory. He was the first to use the term “group” in a technical sense ...
MATH 431 PART 3: IDEALS, FACTOR RINGS - it
MATH 431 PART 3: IDEALS, FACTOR RINGS - it

... In the previous section we showed that if I is an ideal then coset addition and multiplication defined by equation (1) are well-defined. This is similar to the progression we took when we constructed groups of cosets in MATH 430! Theorem 5. If I is an ideal of a ring R, then the set R/I of additive ...
distinguished subfields - American Mathematical Society
distinguished subfields - American Mathematical Society

... be noted that there is a class of extensions which have every maximal separable intermediate field distinguished. For if L/K is any transcendental extension with order of inseparability 1, let L* be the irreducible form of L/K. If 5 is a maximal separable extension if K in L* and a G L* \ S with ap ...
Abel–Ruffini theorem
Abel–Ruffini theorem

Non-Measurable Sets
Non-Measurable Sets

... Let Q denote the set of rational numbers. A coset of Q in R is any set of the form x + Q = {x + q | q ∈ Q} where x ∈ R. It is easy to see that the cosets of Q form a partition of R. In particular: 1. If x, y ∈ R and y − x ∈ Q, then x + Q = y + Q. 2. If x, y ∈ R and y − x ∈ / Q then x + Q and y + Q a ...
§9 Subgroups
§9 Subgroups

Solution
Solution

Another Look at Square Roots and Traces (and Quadratic Equations
Another Look at Square Roots and Traces (and Quadratic Equations

4. Rings 4.1. Basic properties. Definition 4.1. A ring is a set R with
4. Rings 4.1. Basic properties. Definition 4.1. A ring is a set R with

x - TeacherWeb
x - TeacherWeb

< 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ... 59 >

Field (mathematics)

In abstract algebra, a field is a nonzero commutative division ring, or equivalently a ring whose nonzero elements form an abelian group under multiplication. As such it is an algebraic structure with notions of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division satisfying the appropriate abelian group equations and distributive law. The most commonly used fields are the field of real numbers, the field of complex numbers, and the field of rational numbers, but there are also finite fields, fields of functions, algebraic number fields, p-adic fields, and so forth.Any field may be used as the scalars for a vector space, which is the standard general context for linear algebra. The theory of field extensions (including Galois theory) involves the roots of polynomials with coefficients in a field; among other results, this theory leads to impossibility proofs for the classical problems of angle trisection and squaring the circle with a compass and straightedge, as well as a proof of the Abel–Ruffini theorem on the algebraic insolubility of quintic equations. In modern mathematics, the theory of fields (or field theory) plays an essential role in number theory and algebraic geometry.As an algebraic structure, every field is a ring, but not every ring is a field. The most important difference is that fields allow for division (though not division by zero), while a ring need not possess multiplicative inverses; for example the integers form a ring, but 2x = 1 has no solution in integers. Also, the multiplication operation in a field is required to be commutative. A ring in which division is possible but commutativity is not assumed (such as the quaternions) is called a division ring or skew field. (Historically, division rings were sometimes referred to as fields, while fields were called commutative fields.)As a ring, a field may be classified as a specific type of integral domain, and can be characterized by the following (not exhaustive) chain of class inclusions: Commutative rings ⊃ integral domains ⊃ integrally closed domains ⊃ unique factorization domains ⊃ principal ideal domains ⊃ Euclidean domains ⊃ fields ⊃ finite fields
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report