innocent prisoners and newly discovered non
... may only be attacked collaterally on grounds of newly discovered evidence if the new evidence creates fundamental doubt about the reliability and accuracy of the proceedings); Mulroy, supra note 7 (analyzing the evidentiary standards used in Tennessee regarding newly discovered evidence claims); Mus ...
... may only be attacked collaterally on grounds of newly discovered evidence if the new evidence creates fundamental doubt about the reliability and accuracy of the proceedings); Mulroy, supra note 7 (analyzing the evidentiary standards used in Tennessee regarding newly discovered evidence claims); Mus ...
Evidence of Sexual Experience
... The Court of Criminal Appeal in G.K. made it clear that when asked to grant or refuse an application under s. 3 of the Act of 1981 the trial judge must make a judgment as to whether or not he is satisfied in the terms of section 3 (2). The Court said if the trial judge concludes “that it would be un ...
... The Court of Criminal Appeal in G.K. made it clear that when asked to grant or refuse an application under s. 3 of the Act of 1981 the trial judge must make a judgment as to whether or not he is satisfied in the terms of section 3 (2). The Court said if the trial judge concludes “that it would be un ...
HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE
... piece of evidence of rape be proved beyond a reasonable doubt? Is this not what an accused is entitled to in a criminal trial? It is trite that the standard of proof required of a prosecution, in a criminal trial, is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that every requirement of the criminal ...
... piece of evidence of rape be proved beyond a reasonable doubt? Is this not what an accused is entitled to in a criminal trial? It is trite that the standard of proof required of a prosecution, in a criminal trial, is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that every requirement of the criminal ...
RTF 363K - High Court of Australia
... respondent's notice of contention. The trial judge's directions to the jury were sufficient to identify the permissible and impermissible uses of the cannabis evidence for the purposes of s 34R(1) of the Evidence Act. The verdict at trial was therefore not attended by an error of law. A majority of ...
... respondent's notice of contention. The trial judge's directions to the jury were sufficient to identify the permissible and impermissible uses of the cannabis evidence for the purposes of s 34R(1) of the Evidence Act. The verdict at trial was therefore not attended by an error of law. A majority of ...