Student Voting Rights - ValpoScholar
... Traditionally, most states have provided that citizens must be
21 years of age before they are able to exercise the right to vote.
One court found that in most instances this represents an arbitrary age
line drawn by state constitution.8" The exceptions to this general rule
were Alaska," Georgia, 7 ...
The Emerging Democratic Presidential Majority
... decided by a margin by less than five percentage points. Moreover, in those elections every one
of the nation’s most populous states was closely contested including California, New York,
Illinois, and Texas. In 1976, states decided by less than five points accounted for 299 electoral
votes while sta ...
chapter 13 notes
... Flaws in the Electoral College
There are three major defects in the
(1) It is possible to win the popular vote in the presidential election,
but lose the electoral college vote. This has happened four times
in U.S. history (1824, 1876, 1888, and 2000).
(2) Nothing in the Constitu ...
US Presidency - Cloudfront.net
... selection of the president, reminds us of their importance in our
federal system (federalism).
Framers did not want a country reflective of the majority will.
The Electoral College encourages more person-to-person
campaigning by candidates, as they spend time in both the big
cities and smaller citie ...
The Presidency - cloudfront.net
... A commonly heard reform suggests that the electoral college be
done away with altogether in favor of direct popular election. At
the polls, voters would vote directly for the President and Vice
President instead of electors.
The national bonus plan would automatically offer the winner of
the popular ...
Vote pairing occurs when two people commit to voting in a mutually agreed upon manner. Vote swapping is a common example of vote pairing, where a voter in one district agrees to vote tactically for a less-preferred candidate or party who has a greater chance of winning in their district, in exchange for a voter from another district voting tactically for the candidate the first voter prefers, because that candidate has a greater possibility of winning in that district.Vote pairing occurs informally (i.e., without binding contracts) but sometimes with great sophistication in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada.In the UK and Australia, pairing is the mechanism by which two members of parliament of opposing parties agree, with the consent of their party whips, to abstain from voting if the other one is unable to vote. Thus maintaining the balance, of votes if one or the other is unable to attend. A three-line whip would usually be excepted from this agreement. For MPs who are not paired a bisque, a rota system allowing absence is used.Using UK elections as an example, tactical voting is often between the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats. There may be one constituency in which the Labour Party and the Conservative Party candidates are running in a tight race, with the Liberal Democrat far behind. In another constituency, the Liberal Democrat and Conservative candidates may be in a tight race, with the Labour candidate far behind. A Liberal Democrat voter in the first constituency would agree to vote for the Labour candidate in exchange for a Labour voter from the second constituency voting for the Liberal Democrat candidate.Tactical voting has been used since 2000 as a strategy for the U.S. presidential election, with voters from ""safe"" states, or nonswing states, voting for third-party candidates, and voters from states with contested races, or swing state, voting for the second-preference candidate of the voters from the third party. By the United States Electoral College for presidential elections, all of a state's votes go to the winning candidate for that state, no matter how close the margin was (Maine and Nebraska excepted). Often third-party candidates for president are unable to garner any Electoral College votes, but they can call attention to their causes by the total popular vote that they garner. In vote-pairing agreements, third-party supporters in swing states vote strategically with major-party supporters in nonswing states, so that the third party candidate can hopefully get more of the popular vote, while the major-party candidate can get more of the Electoral College vote.