
The Tariff in the Age of Jackson - Trace: Tennessee Research and
... many people have taken time out of their busy lives to assist me in this endeavor. I would like to thank Professor Daniel Feller for his guidance and patience. His door was always open. His sharp and insightful comments have strengthened the hand of the novice historian. Professors Steven Ash, Ernes ...
... many people have taken time out of their busy lives to assist me in this endeavor. I would like to thank Professor Daniel Feller for his guidance and patience. His door was always open. His sharp and insightful comments have strengthened the hand of the novice historian. Professors Steven Ash, Ernes ...
ST 04 - Comportamento PolĂtico Presidential Coattails in
... coattails effect should work differently in coalitional presidentialism. More precisely, presidential coattails should benefit most coalition partners because the imperatives of coalition-making and sustaining force presidential candidates and their co-partisans to make concessions to allied partie ...
... coattails effect should work differently in coalitional presidentialism. More precisely, presidential coattails should benefit most coalition partners because the imperatives of coalition-making and sustaining force presidential candidates and their co-partisans to make concessions to allied partie ...
US Presidency - Cloudfront.net
... campaigning by candidates, as they spend time in both the big cities and smaller cities in battleground states. In close, contested elections, recounts will usually be confined to a state or two, rather than an across-the-country recount that might be required if we had direct election of the presid ...
... campaigning by candidates, as they spend time in both the big cities and smaller cities in battleground states. In close, contested elections, recounts will usually be confined to a state or two, rather than an across-the-country recount that might be required if we had direct election of the presid ...
United States presidential election, 1888

The United States presidential election of 1888 was the 26th quadrennial presidential election, held on Tuesday, November 6, 1888. It saw Grover Cleveland of New York, the incumbent president and a Democrat, try to secure a second term against the Republican nominee Benjamin Harrison, a former U.S. Senator from Indiana. The economy was prosperous and the nation was at peace, but Cleveland lost re-election in the Electoral College, even though he won a plurality of the popular vote by a narrow margin.Tariff policy was the principal issue in the election. Harrison took the side of industrialists and factory workers who wanted to keep tariffs high, while Cleveland strenuously denounced high tariffs as unfair to consumers. His opposition to Civil War pensions and inflated currency also made enemies among veterans and farmers. On the other hand, he held a strong hand in the South and border states, and appealed to former Republican Mugwumps.Harrison swept almost the entire North and Midwest (losing only Connecticut and New Jersey), and narrowly carried the swing states of New York (Cleveland's home state) and Indiana (Harrison's home state) by a margin of 1% or less to achieve a majority of the electoral vote. Unlike the election of 1884, the power of the Tammany Hall political machine in New York City helped deny Cleveland the electoral votes of his home state.This election was notable for being the third of four U.S. presidential elections in which the winner did not win the popular vote. The first, in 1824, saw John Quincy Adams elected by the House. The second occurred just 12 years earlier in 1876, while the fourth would occur 112 years later in 2000. It is also notable because only two states (New York and Indiana) switched parties in the electoral vote in comparison to the preceding election. It would not be until the election of 2012 that only two states (Indiana and North Carolina) would switch parties in consecutive elections.