The FTC: What you need to know about one of the most relentless
... cybersecurity policies and were primarily resolved through a consent decree requiring appropriate data security safeguards and a period of FTC oversight which could last up to 20 years. In recent years, the FTC has broadened its scope, now expanded to include actions against companies for “unreasona ...
... cybersecurity policies and were primarily resolved through a consent decree requiring appropriate data security safeguards and a period of FTC oversight which could last up to 20 years. In recent years, the FTC has broadened its scope, now expanded to include actions against companies for “unreasona ...
The Economics of Minimum Resale Price Maintenance
... If a case arises that warrants more lenient treatment of vertical pricing restraints, the Court should still begin with a firm presumption that vertical minimum price fixing is unlawful. That presumption should only be rebuttable by a factual, casespecific showing that (1) vertical minimum price fix ...
... If a case arises that warrants more lenient treatment of vertical pricing restraints, the Court should still begin with a firm presumption that vertical minimum price fixing is unlawful. That presumption should only be rebuttable by a factual, casespecific showing that (1) vertical minimum price fix ...
question i
... multiple choice questions that are simultaneously administered nationwide. However, every state reserves at least half of the exam for questions it creates and administers itself, often on peculiarities of its own statutory and common law. Thus, studying for the bar exam differs to some extent in ea ...
... multiple choice questions that are simultaneously administered nationwide. However, every state reserves at least half of the exam for questions it creates and administers itself, often on peculiarities of its own statutory and common law. Thus, studying for the bar exam differs to some extent in ea ...
Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC
Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC, 312 U.S. 457 (1941), is a 1941 decision of the United States Supreme Court sustaining an order of the Federal Trade Commission against a boycott agreement (concerted refusal to deal) among manufacturers of ""high-fashion"" dresses. The purpose of the boycott was to suppress ""style piracy"" (unauthorized copying of original dress creations of Fashion Guild members). The FTC found the Fashion Guild in violation of § 5 of the FTC Act, because the challenged conduct was a per se violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act.