• Study Resource
  • Explore Categories
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Ethical and Philosophical Connotations of Foreign Policy Doctrines
Ethical and Philosophical Connotations of Foreign Policy Doctrines

moral
moral

... that all truth is relative, that there is no such thing as an objective truth, that truth depends on many factors such as history, the situation, the people, those in power etc. Leads to the belief that there are no universal moral rules, we can always imagine a situation where it would be ok to lie ...
Relativism - A Level Philosophy
Relativism - A Level Philosophy

...  Relativism does not imply tolerance.  Incoherence:  1) there are no objective moral truths, so  2) you ought to respect other moralities  But (2) states what is supposed to be an objective moral truth!  What if my society’s moral code recommends intolerance? ...
Relativism
Relativism

...  Relativism does not imply tolerance.  Incoherence:  1) there are no objective moral truths, so  2) you ought to respect other moralities  But (2) states what is supposed to be an objective moral truth!  What if my society’s moral code recommends intolerance? ...
2525022k9 - Ursula Stange
2525022k9 - Ursula Stange

... • The deductive argument is important because if the premises can be shown to be true, and the form is valid, then the conclusion must be accepted… ...
1

Anekantavada

Anekāntavāda (Sanskrit: अनेकान्तवाद ""skepticism"") is one of the most important and fundamental doctrines of Jainism given by Mahavira, the last tirthankara. It refers to the principles of pluralism and multiplicity of viewpoints, the notion that truth and reality are perceived differently from diverse points of view, and that no single point of view is the complete truth.Jains contrast all attempts to proclaim absolute truth with andhagajanyāyah, which can be illustrated through the parable of the ""blind men and an elephant"". In this story, each blind man felt a different part of an elephant (trunk, leg, ear, etc.). All the men claimed to understand and explain the true appearance of the elephant, but could only partly succeed, due to their limited perspectives. This principle is more formally stated by observing that objects are infinite in their qualities and modes of existence, so they cannot be completely grasped in all aspects and manifestations by finite human perception. According to the Jains, only the Kevalis—omniscient beings—can comprehend objects in all aspects and manifestations; others are only capable of partial knowledge. Consequently, no single, specific, human view can claim to represent absolute truth.The origins of anekāntavāda can be traced back to the teachings of Mahāvīra (599–527 BCE), the 24th Jain Tīrthankara. The dialectical concepts of syādvāda ""conditioned viewpoints"" and nayavāda ""partial viewpoints"" arose from anekāntavāda, providing it with more detailed logical structure and expression. The Sanskrit compound an-eka-anta-vāda literally means ""doctrine of uncertainty"" (an- ""not"", ekānta ""certainty"" or ""single-natured"", vāda (""school of thought"" or ""thesis""); it is roughly translated into English as ""non-absolutism"". An-ekānta ""uncertainty, non-exclusivity"" is the opposite of ekānta (eka+anta) ""exclusiveness, absoluteness, necessity"" (or also ""monotheistic doctrine"").Anekāntavāda encourages its adherents to consider the views and beliefs of their rivals and opposing parties. Proponents of anekāntavāda apply this principle to religion and philosophy, reminding themselves that any religion or philosophy—even Jainism—which clings too dogmatically to its own tenets, is committing an error based on its limited point of view. The principle of anekāntavāda also influenced Mahatma Gandhi to adopt principles of religious tolerance, ahiṃsā and satyagraha.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report