KEEP YOUR SCISSORS OFF MY BILL OF RIGHTS
... No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. ...
... No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. ...
Chapter 1
... The Rights of Criminal Defendants Due process rights Procedural guarantees provided by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments for those accused of crimes. Warren Court made several provisions of the Bill of Rights dealing with the liberties of criminal defendants (those charged but no ...
... The Rights of Criminal Defendants Due process rights Procedural guarantees provided by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments for those accused of crimes. Warren Court made several provisions of the Bill of Rights dealing with the liberties of criminal defendants (those charged but no ...
Thank the Deity of you choice, or not, for the Bill of Rights
... No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. ...
... No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. ...
Bill of Rights Handout - Garnet Valley School District
... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. ...
... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. ...
The Bill of Rights Amendment I Congress shall make no law
... peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Amendment II A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Amendment III No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quarte ...
... peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Amendment II A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Amendment III No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quarte ...
KATHY KASE KARDS
... Fremont Weeks was suspected of using the mail system to distribute chances in a lottery, which was considered gambling and was illegal in Missouri. Federal agents entered his house, searched his room, and obtained papers belonging to him. Later, the federal agents returned to the house in order to c ...
... Fremont Weeks was suspected of using the mail system to distribute chances in a lottery, which was considered gambling and was illegal in Missouri. Federal agents entered his house, searched his room, and obtained papers belonging to him. Later, the federal agents returned to the house in order to c ...
Ch. 15: The Bill of Rights
... What it means: the government cannot make you go to a certain type of church, tell what to say or not to say, or tell you that you cannot get together with a group of other people, and if you don’t like what a person in the government says, you should get a piece of paper and have other people sign ...
... What it means: the government cannot make you go to a certain type of church, tell what to say or not to say, or tell you that you cannot get together with a group of other people, and if you don’t like what a person in the government says, you should get a piece of paper and have other people sign ...
Civil Liberties and Rights of the Accused
... • 1.) substantive due process - what the law is about must be fair (substantive = what it’s made of, its substance) • 2.) procedural due process - how the law is enforced must be fair (procedural = how you do it) ...
... • 1.) substantive due process - what the law is about must be fair (substantive = what it’s made of, its substance) • 2.) procedural due process - how the law is enforced must be fair (procedural = how you do it) ...
Amendment II - National Education Project
... No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. ...
... No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. ...
Chapter 4 - Buckeye Valley
... ex.US v. Leon -Justices also decided to establish the GOOD-FAITH exception to the rule; evidence could be used if the police mistakenly thought they were operating under a constitutionally valid warrant. ex. Knowles v. Iowa Stopped for speeding and having NO probable cause search car and found drugs ...
... ex.US v. Leon -Justices also decided to establish the GOOD-FAITH exception to the rule; evidence could be used if the police mistakenly thought they were operating under a constitutionally valid warrant. ex. Knowles v. Iowa Stopped for speeding and having NO probable cause search car and found drugs ...
Group Eight
... Solidifying Court Case: – The Election of 1800: In the original Electoral College, everyone running for office ran for president and whoever was the majority contender, won the presidency with the runner up becoming Vice President. However, in the election of 1800, a problem was exposed: If each mem ...
... Solidifying Court Case: – The Election of 1800: In the original Electoral College, everyone running for office ran for president and whoever was the majority contender, won the presidency with the runner up becoming Vice President. However, in the election of 1800, a problem was exposed: If each mem ...
federalism - State College Area School District
... • West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943) The Court ruled the West Virginia School Board’s policy requiring students and teachers to recite the pledge of allegiance unconstitutional. • Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) The Supreme Court ruled that wearing black armbands to protest the Vi ...
... • West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943) The Court ruled the West Virginia School Board’s policy requiring students and teachers to recite the pledge of allegiance unconstitutional. • Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) The Supreme Court ruled that wearing black armbands to protest the Vi ...
Amendment 1 - Your History Site
... danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for pu ...
... danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for pu ...
THE BILL OF RIGHTS
... peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. AMENDMENT II ...
... peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. AMENDMENT II ...
here - Global Travel Alliance
... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Amendment II A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall ...
... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Amendment II A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall ...
The Constitution and the Amendment Process
... May be limited if it endangers the lives of citizens (Ex: Cannot yell “Fire” in a theater, bomb on an airplane—think “Meet the Parents”) Texas v. Johnson—It is constitutional to burn the American flag as an act of freedom of expression ...
... May be limited if it endangers the lives of citizens (Ex: Cannot yell “Fire” in a theater, bomb on an airplane—think “Meet the Parents”) Texas v. Johnson—It is constitutional to burn the American flag as an act of freedom of expression ...
The Bill of Rights
... military that could be controlled by government authorities. They were well aware of the abuses that came when a King or Prime Minister could control a standing army. Armed citizens provided an important check and balance of power. The framers well understood the threat to freedom when gun ownership ...
... military that could be controlled by government authorities. They were well aware of the abuses that came when a King or Prime Minister could control a standing army. Armed citizens provided an important check and balance of power. The framers well understood the threat to freedom when gun ownership ...
Reading
... against any discrimination in employment, education, housing or credit rights due to a person's race, color, sex (or sometimes sexual orientation), religion, national origin, age or handicap. Establishment Clause – Clause of the First Amendment’s religion protection stating that the government may n ...
... against any discrimination in employment, education, housing or credit rights due to a person's race, color, sex (or sometimes sexual orientation), religion, national origin, age or handicap. Establishment Clause – Clause of the First Amendment’s religion protection stating that the government may n ...
The Amendments - Explore PA History
... Student Handout 2-The Bill of Rights Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a r ...
... Student Handout 2-The Bill of Rights Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a r ...
arren, Burger, Rehnquist Court - Manasquan Public School District
... convicted using that evidence. Olmstead's lawyer appealed arguing that the police had violated his right to privacy by listening in on his phone conversations. He further argued that the evidence used to convict him should be thrown out because it was obtained without a warrant. Olmstead's convictio ...
... convicted using that evidence. Olmstead's lawyer appealed arguing that the police had violated his right to privacy by listening in on his phone conversations. He further argued that the evidence used to convict him should be thrown out because it was obtained without a warrant. Olmstead's convictio ...
The Top 30 Supreme Court Cases
... 9. New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) ~ Ruled that public officials cannot win a suit for defamation unless the statement is made with "actual malice." ...
... 9. New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) ~ Ruled that public officials cannot win a suit for defamation unless the statement is made with "actual malice." ...
CIVIL LIBERTIES
... In order to meet the definition of obscene material articulated in Miller, three conditions must be met: 1. whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient (unwholesome interest or desire) interest. 2. whether ...
... In order to meet the definition of obscene material articulated in Miller, three conditions must be met: 1. whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient (unwholesome interest or desire) interest. 2. whether ...
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
... The Court found that if police learn of evidence by unconstitutional means, they may still introduce it at trial if they can prove that they would have found the evidence anyway through constitutional means. There is an “inevitable discovery” exception to the Exclusionary Rule. New Jersey v. T.L.O. ...
... The Court found that if police learn of evidence by unconstitutional means, they may still introduce it at trial if they can prove that they would have found the evidence anyway through constitutional means. There is an “inevitable discovery” exception to the Exclusionary Rule. New Jersey v. T.L.O. ...
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution is the part of the Bill of Rights that prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause. It was adopted in response to the abuse of the writ of assistance, a type of general search warrant issued by the British government and a major source of tension in pre-Revolutionary America. The Fourth Amendment was introduced in Congress in 1789 by James Madison, along with the other amendments in the Bill of Rights, in response to Anti-Federalist objections to the new Constitution. Congress submitted the amendment to the states on September 28, 1789. By December 15, 1791, the necessary three-quarters of the states had ratified it. On March 1, 1792, Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson announced the adoption of the amendment.Because the Bill of Rights did not initially apply to the states, and federal criminal investigations were less common in the first century of the nation's history, there is little significant case law for the Fourth Amendment before the 20th century. The amendment was held to apply to the states in Mapp v. Ohio (1961).Under the Fourth Amendment, search and seizure (including arrest) should be limited in scope according to specific information supplied to the issuing court, usually by a law enforcement officer who has sworn by it. Fourth Amendment case law deals with three central questions: what government activities constitute ""search"" and ""seizure""; what constitutes probable cause for these actions; and how violations of Fourth Amendment rights should be addressed. Early court decisions limited the amendment's scope to a law enforcement officer's physical intrusion onto private property, but with Katz v. United States (1967), the Supreme Court held that its protections, such as the warrant requirement, extend to the privacy of individuals as well as physical locations. Law enforcement officers need a warrant for most search and seizure activities, but the Court has defined a series of exceptions for consent searches, motor vehicle searches, evidence in plain view, exigent circumstances, border searches, and other situations.The exclusionary rule is one way the amendment is enforced. Established in Weeks v. United States (1914), this rule holds that evidence obtained through a Fourth Amendment violation is generally inadmissible at criminal trials. Evidence discovered as a later result of an illegal search may also be inadmissible as ""fruit of the poisonous tree,"" unless it inevitably would have been discovered by legal means.