Document
... – All possible combinations of the sets must be represented. • Shade the appropriate region to represent the given set operation. ...
... – All possible combinations of the sets must be represented. • Shade the appropriate region to represent the given set operation. ...
Document
... have the same length, they should be ordered in ascending order according to the binary number they represent. Thus 0010 precedes 1010 in the ordering. Since all the programs in L are on the list, there are countably many such programs. 2 We now use this result to show that there are noncomputable f ...
... have the same length, they should be ordered in ascending order according to the binary number they represent. Thus 0010 precedes 1010 in the ordering. Since all the programs in L are on the list, there are countably many such programs. 2 We now use this result to show that there are noncomputable f ...
Math 306, Spring 2012 Homework 1 Solutions
... (4) (5 pts/part) Suppose that S is a set and that R is a ring. Let RS denote the set of all functions f : S → R. (a) Prove that RS is a ring, under the operations defined by the following: for all f, g ∈ RS and all s ∈ S, let (f + g)(s) = f (s) + g(s) and (f g)(s) = f (s)g(s). You may assume closure ...
... (4) (5 pts/part) Suppose that S is a set and that R is a ring. Let RS denote the set of all functions f : S → R. (a) Prove that RS is a ring, under the operations defined by the following: for all f, g ∈ RS and all s ∈ S, let (f + g)(s) = f (s) + g(s) and (f g)(s) = f (s)g(s). You may assume closure ...
II.4. Compactness - Faculty
... of a fundamental sequence are postulated to be ‘near to each other,’ and not near to any fixed point. As a general topological space . . . has no property which leads itself to the definition of such a ‘uniformity,’ it is impossible that a reasonable notion of ‘completeness’ could be defined in it.” ...
... of a fundamental sequence are postulated to be ‘near to each other,’ and not near to any fixed point. As a general topological space . . . has no property which leads itself to the definition of such a ‘uniformity,’ it is impossible that a reasonable notion of ‘completeness’ could be defined in it.” ...
Definition of a quotient group. Let N ¢ G and consider as before the
... Theorem 4.1 (Cayley). Any group G is isomorphic to a subgroup of Sym (G). Proof For a ∈ G, let Ta ∈ Sym (G) be the permutation of G that arises from left multiplication by a. So Ta (x) = ax. Consider the map Φ : G → Sym (G), a 7→ Ta . As Ta (Tb (x)) = Ta (bx) = abx = Tab (x) we have that Ta ◦ Tb = T ...
... Theorem 4.1 (Cayley). Any group G is isomorphic to a subgroup of Sym (G). Proof For a ∈ G, let Ta ∈ Sym (G) be the permutation of G that arises from left multiplication by a. So Ta (x) = ax. Consider the map Φ : G → Sym (G), a 7→ Ta . As Ta (Tb (x)) = Ta (bx) = abx = Tab (x) we have that Ta ◦ Tb = T ...
Solutions to coursework 6 File
... whenever p is a prime and a is not a multiple of p. So a good answer is “use Fermat’s little theorem to factor 280 = 272 · 28 and ignore the first factor”. Another efficient approach you could have used is to factor the exponent 80 as 5·2·2·2·2, which implies that 280 = ((((25 )2 )2 )2 )2 . You can ...
... whenever p is a prime and a is not a multiple of p. So a good answer is “use Fermat’s little theorem to factor 280 = 272 · 28 and ignore the first factor”. Another efficient approach you could have used is to factor the exponent 80 as 5·2·2·2·2, which implies that 280 = ((((25 )2 )2 )2 )2 . You can ...
SOME REMARKS ON SET THEORY BY P. ERDÖS (Received
... was never published, and Tarski does not remember the details of the proof . I have succeeded in proving that if m is any cardinal number < c, then there exist 2° linear sets no two of which are m-equivalent . I do not know whether my proof differs from that of Lindenbaum, but I have thought it migh ...
... was never published, and Tarski does not remember the details of the proof . I have succeeded in proving that if m is any cardinal number < c, then there exist 2° linear sets no two of which are m-equivalent . I do not know whether my proof differs from that of Lindenbaum, but I have thought it migh ...
Document
... subset of the natural numbers N, then the set is called countable. If |A| = |N|, the set A is countably infinite. The (transfinite) cardinal number of the set N is aleph null = ﭏ0. If a set is not countable we say it is uncountable. P. 1 ...
... subset of the natural numbers N, then the set is called countable. If |A| = |N|, the set A is countably infinite. The (transfinite) cardinal number of the set N is aleph null = ﭏ0. If a set is not countable we say it is uncountable. P. 1 ...
A nonhomogeneous orbit closure of a diagonal subgroup
... connected subgroup A of G is generated by Ad-unipotent elements, a celebrated theorem of Ratner [13] asserts that the action of A is always topologically rigid, settling a conjecture due to Raghunathan. When A is generated by elements which are Ad-split over R, much less is known. Consider the model ...
... connected subgroup A of G is generated by Ad-unipotent elements, a celebrated theorem of Ratner [13] asserts that the action of A is always topologically rigid, settling a conjecture due to Raghunathan. When A is generated by elements which are Ad-split over R, much less is known. Consider the model ...
Notes 1
... proof of Corollary 1.5 depends essentially on Lindelöf’s Lemma, Theorem 1.4, and if we look at the proof of Theorem 1.4 we see that the result depends on the existence of a countably dense subset of R, namely Q. ...
... proof of Corollary 1.5 depends essentially on Lindelöf’s Lemma, Theorem 1.4, and if we look at the proof of Theorem 1.4 we see that the result depends on the existence of a countably dense subset of R, namely Q. ...
Homomorphism of Semigroups Consider two semigroups (S, ∗) and
... (b) Figure B-2(a) gives the addition table for Z4, the integers modulo 4 under addition; and Fig. B-2(b) gives the multiplication table for S = {1, 3, 7, 9} in Z10. (We note that S is a reduced residue system for the integers Z modulo 10.) Let f : Z4→ S be defined by f (0) = 1, ...
... (b) Figure B-2(a) gives the addition table for Z4, the integers modulo 4 under addition; and Fig. B-2(b) gives the multiplication table for S = {1, 3, 7, 9} in Z10. (We note that S is a reduced residue system for the integers Z modulo 10.) Let f : Z4→ S be defined by f (0) = 1, ...
Solution - UC Davis Mathematics
... 5. Find all possible orders of elements in D6 . Solution: The group contains reflections and rotations by multiples of 360 /6 = 60 . Every reflection has order 2, identity has order 1, rotations by 60 and 300 have order 6, rotations by 120 and 240 have order 3 and rotation by 180 has order 2. 6. a) ...
... 5. Find all possible orders of elements in D6 . Solution: The group contains reflections and rotations by multiples of 360 /6 = 60 . Every reflection has order 2, identity has order 1, rotations by 60 and 300 have order 6, rotations by 120 and 240 have order 3 and rotation by 180 has order 2. 6. a) ...
Sequences, Sums, Cardinality
... Assume by contraposition that a bijection f : N → InfiniteStrings exists. Let dn be the nth symbol of string f (n). We define a string x such that the nth symbol of x is dn + 1 (mod 2).Thus ∀n ∈ N. x 6= f (n) and f is not a surjection. Contradiction Similarly for the infinite decimal strings (over d ...
... Assume by contraposition that a bijection f : N → InfiniteStrings exists. Let dn be the nth symbol of string f (n). We define a string x such that the nth symbol of x is dn + 1 (mod 2).Thus ∀n ∈ N. x 6= f (n) and f is not a surjection. Contradiction Similarly for the infinite decimal strings (over d ...
Birkhoff's representation theorem
This is about lattice theory. For other similarly named results, see Birkhoff's theorem (disambiguation).In mathematics, Birkhoff's representation theorem for distributive lattices states that the elements of any finite distributive lattice can be represented as finite sets, in such a way that the lattice operations correspond to unions and intersections of sets. The theorem can be interpreted as providing a one-to-one correspondence between distributive lattices and partial orders, between quasi-ordinal knowledge spaces and preorders, or between finite topological spaces and preorders. It is named after Garrett Birkhoff, who published a proof of it in 1937.The name “Birkhoff's representation theorem” has also been applied to two other results of Birkhoff, one from 1935 on the representation of Boolean algebras as families of sets closed under union, intersection, and complement (so-called fields of sets, closely related to the rings of sets used by Birkhoff to represent distributive lattices), and Birkhoff's HSP theorem representing algebras as products of irreducible algebras. Birkhoff's representation theorem has also been called the fundamental theorem for finite distributive lattices.