• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
An Introduction to Ergodic Theory Normal Numbers: We Can`t See
An Introduction to Ergodic Theory Normal Numbers: We Can`t See

... The intuitive notion here is that X is the space of all states of the system, and x ∈ X is a specific state. Applying τ to x yields τ (x), which is the new state of the system after one time step, and the orbit of x is the sequence of states the system will be in, given that it starts at state x. Fu ...
INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER: Mathematical Logic, Proof and Sets
INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER: Mathematical Logic, Proof and Sets

4.1 Introduction to Linear Spaces
4.1 Introduction to Linear Spaces

Chapter 3, Rings Definitions and examples. We now have several
Chapter 3, Rings Definitions and examples. We now have several

... the subset of S that it maps onto. We write im(f ) = { f (r) | r ∈ R } and call this set the image of f . (The book does not have a symbol for the image or for the kernel which we shall define later.) Now we can say that f : R → S is surjective if S = im(f ). Corollary 3.13. Given a ring homomorphis ...
Homework 7 - Material from Chapters 6-7
Homework 7 - Material from Chapters 6-7

ON THE ISOMETRIES OF CERTAIN FUNCTION
ON THE ISOMETRIES OF CERTAIN FUNCTION

... proofs are not given completely and the theorems are stated in less than full generality. The first purpose of this paper is to supply a new proof for a somewhat more general theorem besides being set in an arbitrary (σ-finite) measure space, this theorem applies to values of p < 1. The preliminarie ...
Properties of Real Numbers - White Plains Public Schools
Properties of Real Numbers - White Plains Public Schools

...  Definition: You can add or multiply numbers in any _______________ ...
A topological version of Bertini`s theorem
A topological version of Bertini`s theorem

Super-Continuous Maps, Feebly-Regular and Completely Feebly
Super-Continuous Maps, Feebly-Regular and Completely Feebly

... The topology on the product space Y above is the Tychonoff topology. i.e. the smallest topology on Y such that every projection from Y is continuous. The next theorem, shows that this easily carries over to any space with weak topology. Theorem 3 Let X have weak topology induced by a collection {fα ...
Orbits - CSE-IITK
Orbits - CSE-IITK

... Remember that the orbit of x ∈ A under the action of G can be defined as, G(x) = {g(x) : g ∈ G}. If every g ∈ G took x to a different element, the size of the orbit would be |G|. But this is too much to expect. If we consider any example, there will be lots of g ∈ G which will take x to a single ele ...
.pdf
.pdf

Note 7 - Counting Techniques
Note 7 - Counting Techniques

... Two numbers that add up to 9 are placed in sets as follows: A1 = {1, 8}, ...
Stable Kneser hypergraphs and ideals in N with the Nikodym
Stable Kneser hypergraphs and ideals in N with the Nikodym

... . As we have already mentioned, we only have to show that χ(H(k, `, m)) ≥ dte. To this end, let M = M(k, m, [n]) denote the vertex set of H(k, `, m), and consider any coloring h : M → [dte − 1] of M with dte − 1 colors. We need to show that if Conjecture 3.2 holds for both k1 and k2 , then there exi ...
(Less) Abstract Algebra
(Less) Abstract Algebra

An Element Prime to and Primary to Another Element in
An Element Prime to and Primary to Another Element in

541Classwork Day 2
541Classwork Day 2

... [None of these has an identity element. Look up the Octonions on  the interwebs for an example that does. You can also cleverly use  the above examples to include an identity element. Simply add a  new element, call it “Bob” and extend the previous operation by  saying that Bob combined with any oth ...
Another property of the Sorgenfrey line
Another property of the Sorgenfrey line

... open cover of X x Y which is closed under finite unions, then 7i’ has a a-locally finite refinement. Let W be such a cover. Let F(n)> be a spectral 1-network for Y, as in (2.4). For each n ~ 1 and for each ntuple (03B11, ···, an) of elements of A, let 4Y(ai , ... , 03B1n) = {R~X: R is open and ...
Properties of Real Numbers The Distributive Property Use the
Properties of Real Numbers The Distributive Property Use the

Rings and fields.
Rings and fields.

THE NUMBER OF UNARY CLONES CONTAINING THE
THE NUMBER OF UNARY CLONES CONTAINING THE

... cardinality ℵα there exist 2|α| + 5 precomplete unary clones, so in particular there are only five precomplete unary clones on a countably infinite set X. Theorem 1. Let X be an infinite set of cardinality κ. If κ is regular, then the precomplete submonoids of O (1) that contain the permutations are ...
CHAP12 The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
CHAP12 The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

... In the previous chapters we worked entirely inside of ℂ. Most of what we did is valid for any field. The only slight change is that where we have a field F and an element α ∉ F we can no longer define F[α] to denote the smallest subfield of ℂ which contains F and α. However whenever we use the symbo ...
2-Digit Multiplication
2-Digit Multiplication

Math 345 Sp 07 Day 8 1. Definition of unit: In ring R, an element a is
Math 345 Sp 07 Day 8 1. Definition of unit: In ring R, an element a is

... 1. Definition of unit: In ring R, an element a is a unit if it has a multiplicative inverse. 2. Definitions of prime and irreducible. Let R be an I.D. a. An element p ∈ R is prime if it is not a unit and whenever p|ab for any a,b ∈ R then either p|a or p|b. b. An element p ∈ R is irreducible if when ...
Equivalent expressions - Mexico Public Schools
Equivalent expressions - Mexico Public Schools

... of factors rather than sums or differences of terms. The expressions (x+3) (x+4) and x (x-2) are in factored form. Expanded Form – The form of an expression made up of sums of differences of terms rather than products of factors. The expressions x2 +7x+12 and x2+2x are in expanded form. Commutative ...
Chapter 5 Cardinality of sets
Chapter 5 Cardinality of sets

< 1 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 ... 98 >

Birkhoff's representation theorem



This is about lattice theory. For other similarly named results, see Birkhoff's theorem (disambiguation).In mathematics, Birkhoff's representation theorem for distributive lattices states that the elements of any finite distributive lattice can be represented as finite sets, in such a way that the lattice operations correspond to unions and intersections of sets. The theorem can be interpreted as providing a one-to-one correspondence between distributive lattices and partial orders, between quasi-ordinal knowledge spaces and preorders, or between finite topological spaces and preorders. It is named after Garrett Birkhoff, who published a proof of it in 1937.The name “Birkhoff's representation theorem” has also been applied to two other results of Birkhoff, one from 1935 on the representation of Boolean algebras as families of sets closed under union, intersection, and complement (so-called fields of sets, closely related to the rings of sets used by Birkhoff to represent distributive lattices), and Birkhoff's HSP theorem representing algebras as products of irreducible algebras. Birkhoff's representation theorem has also been called the fundamental theorem for finite distributive lattices.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report