• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Math 216A Homework 8 “...the usual definition of a scheme is not
Math 216A Homework 8 “...the usual definition of a scheme is not

(1) (P) f fGdx = F(x)G(x)~j
(1) (P) f fGdx = F(x)G(x)~j

... [a, b]. Then there is a constant k such that for every bounded nondecreasReceived by the editors August 17, 1966. 1 It seems curious that a direct proof of the formula based only on the standard definition of the Perron integral does not exist in the literature (see the comment in [2, p. 101 ]). A p ...
Algebraic closure
Algebraic closure

... and is therefore algebraic over F . We conclude that (K, +, · ) ∈ E and that E 4 K for all E in C . Zorn’s Lemma now guarantees the existence of a maximal element F of E . By definition of E , F is an algebraic field extension of F and F ⊆ Ω. It remains to be shown that F is algebraically closed. To ...
+ y - U.I.U.C. Math
+ y - U.I.U.C. Math

... It should be mentioned that certain cases of (5.2), adequate to establish the uniform convexity of Xp{Aff} for some (but not all) p and q, follow directly from Clarkson's inequalities without any convexity theorem. For example, if q§: 2, (5.4) becomes (1.2) for r = q, s = q'; hence (5.4) still holds ...
Math 3333: Fields, Ordering, Completeness and the Real Numbers
Math 3333: Fields, Ordering, Completeness and the Real Numbers

to the manual as a pdf
to the manual as a pdf

... All user commands are prefixed with “gf_”; you need to start by entering the parameters for your field. All fields in this package are of the form Fp [x]/m(x) where p is a prime number and m(x) is an polynomial irreducible over Fp . If the degree of m(x) is n, the the finite field will contain pn el ...
Notes 10
Notes 10

... situation. In our case of maximal tori in compact groups, a first question could be: What if the rank is one? Among the examples of groups we already have seen, SU(2) and SO(3) are of rank one, and those two are, as we shall see, the only ones. In addition to the light shedding, that fact is of grea ...
7 Symplectic Quotients
7 Symplectic Quotients

... Corollary: dΦm : Tm M → g∗ is surjective iff ηm = 0 for all η ∈ g, iff Stab(m) is a finite group (the only Lie groups with Lie algebra 0 are finite groups). Corollary: 0 is a regular value for Φ iff dΦm is surjective for all m ∈ Φ−1 (0) iff Stab(m) is finite iff G acts locally freely on Φ−1 (0). Def ...
ON SOME CLASSES OF GOOD QUOTIENT RELATIONS 1
ON SOME CLASSES OF GOOD QUOTIENT RELATIONS 1

1.2. Probability Measure and Probability Space
1.2. Probability Measure and Probability Space

COUNTING GENERALIZED DYCK PATHS 1. Introduction The
COUNTING GENERALIZED DYCK PATHS 1. Introduction The

... In fact, we prove (1.6) first and then (1.5). Actually, a sequence of nonnegative integers a = (a1 , a2 , · · · ) in (1.5) characterizes the “form” of a Dyck path, and it is interesting that C(m, n) is given by using these sequences. We will see this in the last section. The description of C(m, n) i ...
MTE-6-AST-2004
MTE-6-AST-2004

contact email: donsen2 at hotmail.com Contemporary abstract
contact email: donsen2 at hotmail.com Contemporary abstract

... Group homomorphisms ...
Mat 247 - Definitions and results on group theory Definition: Let G be
Mat 247 - Definitions and results on group theory Definition: Let G be

Sufficient conditions for the spectrality of self
Sufficient conditions for the spectrality of self

... Proposition 2.5. For an expanding matrix M ∈ Mn (Z) and a finite digit set D ⊂ Zn , if Z(µ̂M,D ) ∩ Zn 6= ∅ or if there are two points s1 , s2 ∈ Rn with s1 − s2 ∈ Zn such that the exponential functions es1 (x), es2 (x) are orthogonal in L2 (µM,D ), then there are infinite families of orthogonal expon ...
Homework #3
Homework #3

... Closure: suppose that a, b are two elements of µn . We want to prove that the product ab is an element of µn ; that is, we want to prove that (ab)n = 1. We raise ab to the nth power and use the fact that multiplication in a field is commutative to get (ab)n = an bn . Since a ∈ µn , we know that an = ...
No nontrivial Hamel basis is closed under multiplication
No nontrivial Hamel basis is closed under multiplication

G - WordPress.com
G - WordPress.com

... isomorphic if there is an isomorphism of G onto G’. We shall denote that G and G’ are isomorphic by writing G  G’. ...
3/28/05 Solutions
3/28/05 Solutions

POSTULATES FOR THE INVERSE OPERATIONS IN A GROUP*
POSTULATES FOR THE INVERSE OPERATIONS IN A GROUP*

... ©-symbols z, x are given in (1), an ©-symbol y is uniquely determined, and when the©-symbols y, z are given in (1), an ©-symbol x is uniquely determined. In this case we may associate with the function F(x, y) two other one-valued functions y = G(z, x), x = H(y, z) defined over the collection®. Thes ...
The natural numbers
The natural numbers

... Suppose n ∈ A, and let m ∈ N again be arbitrary. If n + 1 < m, then 1 < m, so m − 1 ∈ N and n < m − 1; hence, n + 1 ≤ m − 1, by the inductive hypothesis (that is, since n ∈ A). Thus, (n + 1) + 1 ≤ m. And this was true for arbitrary m, so A is inductive, and A = N, as required.  In the above proof w ...
x+y
x+y

... algebra could construct and resolve any logical, numerical relationship. • His thesis was published in the 1938 issue of the Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers , and proved that a two-valued Boolean algebra (whose members are most commonly denoted 0 and 1, or false and tr ...
Algebra Final Exam Solutions 1. Automorphisms of groups. (a
Algebra Final Exam Solutions 1. Automorphisms of groups. (a

Isomorphisms  - MIT OpenCourseWare
Isomorphisms - MIT OpenCourseWare

... Given a symmetry of a triangle, the natural thing to do is to look at the corresponding permutation of its vertices. On the other hand, it is not hard to show that every permutation in S3 can be realised as a symmetry of the triangle. It is very useful to have a more formal definition of what it mean ...


< 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 ... 98 >

Birkhoff's representation theorem



This is about lattice theory. For other similarly named results, see Birkhoff's theorem (disambiguation).In mathematics, Birkhoff's representation theorem for distributive lattices states that the elements of any finite distributive lattice can be represented as finite sets, in such a way that the lattice operations correspond to unions and intersections of sets. The theorem can be interpreted as providing a one-to-one correspondence between distributive lattices and partial orders, between quasi-ordinal knowledge spaces and preorders, or between finite topological spaces and preorders. It is named after Garrett Birkhoff, who published a proof of it in 1937.The name “Birkhoff's representation theorem” has also been applied to two other results of Birkhoff, one from 1935 on the representation of Boolean algebras as families of sets closed under union, intersection, and complement (so-called fields of sets, closely related to the rings of sets used by Birkhoff to represent distributive lattices), and Birkhoff's HSP theorem representing algebras as products of irreducible algebras. Birkhoff's representation theorem has also been called the fundamental theorem for finite distributive lattices.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report