Download Theoretical Basis for this Curriculum

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Holonomic brain theory wikipedia , lookup

Bilingual lexical access wikipedia , lookup

Sloppy identity wikipedia , lookup

Embodied cognitive science wikipedia , lookup

Psycholinguistics wikipedia , lookup

Cognitive psychology wikipedia , lookup

Reconstructive memory wikipedia , lookup

Conceptual model wikipedia , lookup

Dual process theory wikipedia , lookup

Junction Grammar wikipedia , lookup

Bioecological model wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical model wikipedia , lookup

Neural modeling fields wikipedia , lookup

Subvocalization wikipedia , lookup

Reading education in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Top-down and bottom-up design wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Theoretical Basis for this Curriculum
An early model presented reading comprehension as a 'bottom-up' process " (Gough,
1972; LaBerge, and Samuels,1974) -- a linear, text-grounded activity in which the
reader decoded orthographic input and then linked words into sentences, sentences
into paragraphs. The 'bottom-up' skills are especially crucial at the lower levels of
EAP.
Smith (1971) and Goodman (1967) helped to integrate the field of cognitive
psychology into the field of reading, with the top-down approach that defined reading
as thinking—an active, constructive process. This more reader-centered model
drew on Bartlett's schema theory (1932) which defined the schema as a mass of past
experience actively engaged in organizing and interpreting new experience. However,
schemata are not fixed, but expand and evolve as new information is acquired
(Anderson and Pearson, 1984). It is this dynamic nature of the schema which is most
salient for reading comprehension models. Sharkey (1990) states that schemata are
constructed in response to 'textual input.' The EAP student must be made aware of the
need to reconstruct schemata during the process of reading through self-monitoring.
A third model, drawing on both the 'bottom-up' and 'top-down' approaches is the
interactive model, which presents reading as a process in which the reader uses the
lexical and syntactic information in a text, not necessarily linearly, to construct
meaning while utilizing his own knowledge, expectations and assumptions
( Barr, Sadow, and Blachowicz, 1990). It is this integrative model which is applied in
the comprehension of academic content.