Download Spin filtering in mesoscopic systems

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Spin filtering in mesoscopic
systems
Shlomi Matityahu, Amnon Aharony,
Ora Entin-Wohlman
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Shingo Katsumoto
University of Tokyo
Spintronics (spin electronics)
• Spintronics – Study of spin degrees of
freedom in condensed matter systems
• Typical questions –
• How to polarize and manipulate effectively a spin
system?
• How long is the system able to remember its spin
orientation?
• How can spin be detected?
• Potential applications –
• Giant magnetoresistance (GMR)
read/write head
• Quantum computer??
Disk
Spin filtering
• Generate spin-polarized current out of an
unpolarized source
Unpolarized
beam
Spin
filter
Polarized
beam
• Can we find a system which generates a full
polarization in a tunable direction?
The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect
• An electron travelling from point A to point B
in a region with zero magnetic field, but nonzero vector potential A
,
acquires
a
phase
B
 AB 
e
c
 A  dr
A

  2
0
• The phase acquired in a close loop is
 - The magnetic flux through the surface
enclosed by the loop
hc
0 
- Flux quantum
e
Spin-Orbit interaction (SOI)
• Non-relativistic limit of the Dirac equation
H SO 
   p  V 
2
 2mec 
• Rashba SOI - In a 2DEG confined to a plane by
an asymmetric potential along z
H
R
SO
kR

p y x  px y 

me
• This is equivalent to an effective
(momentum-dependent) magnetic field
• The strength of the Rashba term can be
tuned by a gate voltage!
The Aharonov-Casher (AC) effect
• Magnetic moment in an electric field also
acquires a quantum mechanical phase
1 
e

H
p

A
SO 

2me 
c

ASO 
4me c
 E
2
 AC
B
e

ASO  dr

cA
• In contrast to the AB phase, the AC phase is
given by an SU(2) rotation matrix U  eiK 
Quantum networks – Tightbinding approach
• Discrete Schrödinger equation
binding Hamiltonian
   m   m
tight-
  J mnU mn  n
n
 m - 2-component spinor at site m
 m - site energy
J mn - hopping amplitude (a scalar)
U mn  ei eiK  - unitary matrix representing AB
and AC phases
mn
mn
Our spin filter – A simple exercise
in quantum mechanics
Derivation of spin filtering
• In general, one has to solve for the
transmission matrix of the quantum network
and then look for the filtering conditions
n
ikna
 ikna

e


re
r

in

ik  n 1 a
te
t


t t  T in
T  t nˆ ' nˆ  t nˆ ' nˆ
• The main conclusion – we can achieve full
spin filtering in a tunable direction provided
we use both SOI and AB.
Additional conclusions
• The main conclusion – we can achieve full
spin filtering in a tunable direction provided
we use both SOI and AB
• The spin filter can also serve as a spin reader
• Spin filtering is robust against current leakage