Download did NOT begin as state-led imperial conquest. It began in India and

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Islam and Sikhism wikipedia , lookup

Islam and war wikipedia , lookup

Islam and secularism wikipedia , lookup

Islamic schools and branches wikipedia , lookup

War against Islam wikipedia , lookup

Love Jihad wikipedia , lookup

Islamic missionary activity wikipedia , lookup

Islam and modernity wikipedia , lookup

Islamic culture wikipedia , lookup

Islam in Indonesia wikipedia , lookup

Islam and other religions wikipedia , lookup

Hindu–Islamic relations wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The British Raj in India
• 1600 – Charter granted to British East
India Company
• 1757 – Clive conquers Bengal
• 1857 – “The Mutiny”
• 1757-1857 – “Company Raj”
• 1857-1947 – “Crown Raj”
Sir Thomas Roe at Agra 1615
Seeking Protection for British “Factory”
Robert Clive accepting Bengal in 1757
King George-V Delhi Durbar 1905
King George-V Delhi Durbar 1905
Brief History of Colonialism
• European colonialism (second wave) did NOT begin as state-led imperial
conquest. It began in India and was the result of the maneuvers of a
private organization, the British East India Company, to control trade
and commerce in India and the Indian Ocean.
• 17th and 18th century encounter of Europeans with Indians was not
clearly marked by the sense of white racial supremacy that later came to
define European colonialism.
• Colonial-Orientalist scholarship: the making of histories and the
defining of traditions
• Colonial administration: enumeration and classification of people;
creation of “religion” as a category and as the primary marker of
identity.
• The “high noon” of colonialism in the 19th century was marked by the
now fully articulated justification of a “Civilizing Mission” (expressed in
colonial education as well as in missionary activity); by the late 19th
century most of Africa and Asia were under some form of European
Colonial rule
Some effects of Colonialism on colonized societies
•
•
•
•
•
•
Reconfiguration of identities, privileging Religion as primary marker of
public identity; colonial codification of religious law
Categorization and codification of Religious traditions; creation of textually
based normative definitions of what is “legitimately” and “authentically”
Islamic and what is not; exclusion of many important strands within
religious traditions
For instance, Sufism and local variation are considered “low” and
“adulterated” Islam, while certain Arabic texts, including the Quran and
some arbitrarily chosen legal books, define what is normative Islam
European Christian missionary activity as well as Western criticisms of
“inferior” non-western traditions, especially Islam, resulted in a variety of
reactions from the colonized – defenses, apologies, counter-attacks
Movements spring up in response to the material, moral and intellectual
threat of Western domination; amongst Muslims in particular the desire is
to prove to both themselves and the West that Islam can be an effective
modern force, a challenge to European style modernity
Territorial nationalism; Muslims (and everyone else in Africa & Asia) in precolonial times lived in empires and kingdoms with shifting and porous
boundaries; territorial nationalism was imported from Europe (with intense
criticism) and did not fit easily with older identity configurations such as a
universal Muslim Umma
Significant Changes
•
•
•
•
•
•
Modern Science & Technology
Centralized Administration
An “English” Education
British Legal Systems
Racism & Theories of Racial Difference
Monolithic Social Classifications
British relationship with Muslim India over time:
• India is a Muslim Empire (by virtue of having been ruled by Turko-Persian
dynasties professing Islam – especially the Mughals); Muslim Emperors are
lauded for strength and valour
• India as an essentially Hindu country taken over by Muslim “conquerors”
(discovery of “Ancient Indian Civilization” as a parallel to “Greco-Roman
Civilization” and Islam as the nemesis of both – Edward Gibbon’s “History of the
Decline & Fall of the Roman Empire” very important.)
• Indo-Muslim rulers now judged by British historians according to their “tolerance”
for their Hindu subjects
• The identity of Ancient Hindu/Sanskritic Civilization is taken up by the “Hindus”
to assert an identity for themselves as defined against Indian Muslims
• Muslim elite (Ahsraf) is displaced (slowly) after British takeover and is outrun in
the race for British patronage by newly emerging Hindu communities
• The uprising of 1857 is blamed by the British squarely on the Indians
• Status and prosperity of middle and upper-class Muslims rapidly deteriorates
and various segments from among them respond in different ways to this crisis
How did the British colonial presence divide India into “Hindu-Majority”
and “Muslim-Minority”?
• They wrote histories and social analyses of India, in which they identified a
“Hindu” India and a “Muslim” India.
• They codified religious law for Hindus and Muslims and in the process
made “Hindu” and “Muslim” into rigid, textually defined entities.
• Enumeration and classification for administrative purposes.
• Christian Missionary activity sparked resistance among Indians and spurred
them on to defending and defining their own religious traditions in public to
counter missionary activity.
The Colonial Civilizing Mission
Brigadier General John Jacob in the early 1800s asserted:
“We hold India, then, by being in reality, as in reputation, a
superior race to the Asiatic; and if this natural superiority did not
exist, we should not, and could not, retain the country for one week.
IF, then, we are really a morally superior race, governed by higher
motives and possessing higher attributes than the Asiatics, the more
the natives of India are able to understand us, and the more we
improve their capacity for so understanding, the firmer will become
our power. Away, then with the assumption of equality; and let us
accept our true position of a dominant race. So placed, let us
establish our rule by setting them a high example, by making them
feel the value of truth and honesty, and by raising their moral and
intellectual powers.”
Macaulay’s Minute on Education 1835
• We must at present do our best to form a
class who may be interpreters between us
and the millions whom we govern – a
class of persons Indian in blood and
colour, but English in tastes, in opinions, in
morals and in intellect.
How did Indian Muslims respond to British policies and Orientalist
scholarship?
• Western-oriented reform + Loyalism to British Rule (Sayyid Ahmed Khan &
the Aligarh movement)
• Islamic Universalism + anti-colonial activism (Jamaluddin al-Afghani)
• Indian nationalism + shunning of Western education (The Deoband
movement)
• Western-oriented reform + Indian nationalism (Shibli & Iqbal)