Download What Does Welfare Reform Mean for East Sussex? (Nick Hopkins)

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Pensions crisis wikipedia , lookup

Negative gearing wikipedia , lookup

Public finance wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
What Does
Welfare Reform Mean
for East Sussex?
Presentation to
2012 East Sussex Assembly
5th July
From Politics to Devil in the
Detail
• Politically controversial.
• Process happening in a particular
context.
• Key changes across a 9 year period:
–‘Salami slicing’.
–Localisation.
–3 key transitions.
• Responses, continuing and new.
Policy and Politics I
• Partly cuts driven- £18bn cut to help other
departmental budgets.
• Partly about concerns about inactive or ossified
welfare state:
– People not being incentivised to work.
– Benefits not reflect changes in individual
circumstances.
– System not reflect changing society.
• Will not be able to judge ‘success’ for a long time.
• In terms of ‘fairness’, different conceptions and
detail/ implementation questions.
• Focus within this presentation is on the more
clearly visible negative consequences.
Policy and Politics II
• Forget about the benefits cap, that was about
politics pure and simple.
• Forget any simple and solid split between ‘benefit
claimants’ and ‘hard working families’.
– Many people in work claim means tested
benefits or tax credits.
– Many people in work claim disability related
benefits.
– People move in and out of work all the time.
– It’s about families, not just individuals.
• Protection for pensioners, unless you’re in an age
gap relationship.
Context Going into the Reform
Process
• Ongoing economic issues affecting East Sussex:
– 9,900 people claiming JSA in East Sussex currently, twice the
lowest level, though 1,000 lower than the peak.
– Not just about the stock of people out of work, but flow of people
in and out of work.
– 1900 people per month on average making new claim for JSA
each month (Feb 2009 saw 3,500 new claims).
• East Sussex poverty; 19,000 children live in poverty, 5,700 in
Hastings, 3,200 in Wealden the most affluent district.
• East Sussex ‘Squeezed’:
– High employment, low wage economy, jobs may be insecure.
– Stagnant wages.
– High and differential inflation.
– High house prices.
Impact Across the Changes
• Reduced income and increased
financial stresses and pressure on low
income households who are often
already struggling.
• Pressure on basic household bills:
– Rent/ mortgage.
– Utilities.
• Potential for debt and arrears.
• Financial exclusion and potential for
false economies within a household.
‘Salami Slicing’
• Series of often seemingly technical and small,
but highly significant changes.
• Tax credits example of April 2012; increase in
number of hours have to work before can claim.
• Range of changes to Housing Benefit picked up
in presentation following.
• Difficult to get at precise local figures, but
consequences of tax credit changes will include:
– Less encouragement to work.
– Reduced income as people unable to increase
hours.
Localisation: Key Changes
• Social Fund and Council Tax Benefit
abolished from April 2013.
• Social Fund:
– Crisis loans and Community Care Grants to be
replaced by locally managed funds.
– Budgeting loan to be replaced by ‘payments on
account’ system.
• Council Tax Benefit:
– Locally determined.
– Central grant, 10% reduction with requirement
to protect older claimants.
Localisation: Consequences
• East Sussex and districts working together
to do a ‘mini Beveridge’, requiring:
– Agreement of rules.
– Setting up of system to decide on awards and
process payments.
– Communication with partners and potential
claimants.
• Council Tax Benefit replacement raises
questions about:
– Reduced income for local authorities.
– Response to arrears.
Transition 1: Incapacity Benefit to
Employment Support Allowance.
• New claimants since 2008, transition since
2011, to conclude 2014.
• Assess people on IB/ new claimants as fit
for work, as needing support to prepare for
work, and as unable to work.
• Former group receive JSA. Latter two
groups receive ESA, paid at higher rate
than JSA.
• Onto income based (means tested) ESA
after one year.
The Impact of ESA
• Potential numbers of people affected in East Sussex:
– 4,800 people going from claiming ESA to JSA, losing
income as a result.
– 1,400 people likely to make successful appeals,
support makes a difference.
• Assessments subject to huge criticism, and large numbers
of successful appeals:
– Tick box system- mental health and fluctuating
conditions dealt with poorly.
– Straightforward mistakes and ‘horror stories’.
• Reductions in income for some people who are long term
unemployed who may struggle to find work.
• Stress on often vulnerable people.
• Potential health consequences.
Transition 2:
Disability Living Allowance to
Personal Independence Payment
• New assessment for claimants in context of 20% cut
in overall budget, only to affect people of working
age.
• Range of changes including:
– Reassessment based on points system, and requirement
to complete new form as part of transition.
– Increased qualifying period.
– End of life awards.
– Requirement to inform of change of circumstances.
• Uncertainty about where cuts will fall.
The Impact of PIP?
• Financial loss to East Sussex residents and
economy is substantial, as much as £19m.
• Numbers of people impacted upwards of 5,400
people.
• ‘Son of’ IB to ESA transition in terms of problems?
– How well will the assessment process function?
– Particular concerns about people with mental health
problems.
– Potential for high levels of appeals and burden on
advice agencies.
• Impact on vulnerable people could be severe.
• Potential impact on purchase of care.
• Damage ability of disabled people to work?
Transition 3: Universal Credit
• Introduction from October 2013 to 2017.
• Bringing together of all means tested benefits, (not
including CTB) work related benefits, and tax credits.
• Housing benefit abolished, includes housing
element.
• Calculated through range of components analogous
to current benefits.
• Reduced rate of withdrawal at lower incomes, higher
rate of withdrawal at low to middle incomes- lower
levels of maximum income for claimants.
• Real time communication between HMRC and DWP.
• Payment from two weekly to monthly.
• Vast majority of applications to be made on line.
What will Universal Credit Mean?
• Could mean rates of underclaiming fall, but
reliance on online engagement is problematic.
• Teething troubles will happen.
• Housing Benefit issue picked up by next
presentation.
• Impact on those at upper end of those claiming
tax credits.
• Deliberate challenge to financial capability being
set by government, learn to budget as those in
work.
• Overall situation, possibly less money,
responsible for more and a longer time frame to
manage.
Challenges in Responding.
• Advice sector critical role, and likely to be
burdened in playing it.
• Key themes:
– Early intervention through partnership working.
– ‘Business’ cases for funding in difficult environment.
• Information, to frontline staff and managers, and,
critically, to people affected.
• Crisis responses to people with urgent needs.
• Financial capability, and development of product
responses to back that up.
• Identifying and bearing witness to the impact.
• ‘Pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will’.