Download Frequency Compensation

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Control theory wikipedia , lookup

Dynamic range compression wikipedia , lookup

Islanding wikipedia , lookup

Signal-flow graph wikipedia , lookup

Tube sound wikipedia , lookup

Utility frequency wikipedia , lookup

Transmission line loudspeaker wikipedia , lookup

Control system wikipedia , lookup

Mathematics of radio engineering wikipedia , lookup

Hendrik Wade Bode wikipedia , lookup

Negative feedback wikipedia , lookup

Chirp spectrum wikipedia , lookup

Audio crossover wikipedia , lookup

Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup

Heterodyne wikipedia , lookup

Regenerative circuit wikipedia , lookup

Phase-locked loop wikipedia , lookup

Bode plot wikipedia , lookup

Wien bridge oscillator wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
EL 6033
類比濾波器 (一)
Analog Filter (I)
Lecture1: Frequency Compensation and
Multistage Amplifiers I
Instructor:Po-Yu Kuo
教師:郭柏佑
Outline


Stability and Compensation
Operational Amplifier-Compensation
2
Stability
Y ( s)
H ( s)

X ( s) 1  H ( s)
A( s)  1  H ( s )
T ( s) 
The stability of a feedback system, like any other LTI system, is
completely determined by the location of its poles in the S-plane. The
poles (natural frequencies)of a linear feedback system with closed-loop
Transfer function T(s) are defined as the roots of the characteristic
equation A(s)=0, where A(s) is the denominator polynomial of
T(s).
3
Reference books


Signals and Systems by S. Haykin and B. Van Veen,
John Wiley &Sons, 1999. ISBN 0-471-13820-7
Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, 4th edition, by
F.G. Franklin, J.D. Powell, and A. Emami-Naeini,
Prentice Hall, 2002. ISBN 0-13-032393-4
4
Bode Diagram Method
Y ( s)
H ( s)

X ( s) 1  H ( s)
A( s)  1  H ( s )
T ( s) 
If  H (s)  1 , X(s) = 0, then gain goes to infinity.
The circuit can amplify its own noise until it eventually
begins to oscillates.
 H ( jw1 )  1
5
Oscillation Conditions

A negative feedback system may oscillate at ω1 if
 The phase shift around the loop at this frequency is
so much that the feedback becomes positive
 And the loop gain is still enough to allow signal
buildup
6
Time-domain Response vs. Close-loop Pole Positions
7
Bode Plot of Open-loop Gain for Unstable and Stable Systems
8
Unstable Condition


The situation can be viewed as
 Excessive loop gain at the frequency for which the
phase shift reaches -180°
 Or equivalently, excessive phase at the frequency for
which the loop gain drops to unity
To avoid instability, we must minimize the total phase
shift so that for |βH|=1, H is more positive than -180°
9
Gain Crossover point and Phase Crossover Point



Gain crossover point
 The frequencies at which the magnitude of the loop
gain are equal to unity
Phase crossover point
 The frequencies at which the phase of the loop gain
are equal to -180°
A stable system, the gain crossover point must occur
before the phase crossover
10
Phase Margin





To ensure stability, |βH| must drop to unity beforethe
phase crosses -180°
Phase margin (PM): PM  180   H (w  w1 ) , where w1 is
the unity gain frequency
PM<0, unstable
PM>0, stable
Usually require PM > 45°, prefer 60°
11
One-pole System

In order to analyze the stability of the system, we plot
H ( s  jw )
H ( s  jw )
Single pole cannot contribute phase shift greater
than 90° and the system is unconditionally stable
12
Tow-pole System
System is stable since the
open loop gain drops to
below unity at a frequency for
which the phase is smaller
than -180°
Unity gain frequency move
closer to the original


Same phase, improved
stability, gain crossover point
is moved towards original,
resulting more stable system
13
Frequency Compensation


Typical opamp circuits contain many poles
Opamp must usually be “compensated” - open-loop
transfer function must be modified such that
 The closed loop circuit is stable
 And the time response is well-behaved
14
Compensation Method


The need for compensation arises because the
magnitude does not drop to unity before the phase
reaches -180°
Two methods for compensation:
 Minimize the overall phase shift
 Drop the gain
15
Illustration of the Two Methods
16
Trade-offs

Minimizing phase shift
 Minimize the number of poles in the signal path
 The number of stages must be minimized
 Low voltage gain, limited output swing

Dropping the gain
 Retains the low-frequency gain and output swing
 Reduces the bandwidth by forcing the gain to fall at
lower frequencies
17
General Approach

First try to design an opamp so as to minimize the
number of poles while meeting other requirements

The resulting circuit may still suffer from insufficient
phase margin, we then compensate the opamp
 i.e. modify the design so as to move the gain
crossover point toward the origin
18
Translating the Dominant Pole toward origin
19
Outline


Stability and Compensation
Operational Amplifier-Compensation
20
Compensation of Two-stage Opamp
Input: small R, reduced miller effect due to
cascode – small C, ignored
X: small R, normal C
E: large R (cascode), large C (Miller effect)
A: normal R, large C (load)
21
Miller Compensation
Cc
Cc
22
Pole Splitting as a Result of Miller Compensation


RL=ro9 || ro11
CE: capacitance from
node E to gnd CS stage
23