Download Tides and topographic waves in the vicinity of the Svalbard islands

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Lagoon wikipedia , lookup

Tsunami wikipedia , lookup

Challenger expedition wikipedia , lookup

Red Sea wikipedia , lookup

Sea in culture wikipedia , lookup

Wind wave wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on oceans wikipedia , lookup

Marine habitats wikipedia , lookup

Sea wikipedia , lookup

Arctic Ocean wikipedia , lookup

Physical oceanography wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Tides and topographic waves in the vicinity of the
Svalbard islands in the Barents Sea
by
B. Gjevik
Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo
email: [email protected]
The main purpose of this review is to provide a background perpective for the presentation by Støylen and Weber (2008) on tide generated internal Kelvin waves in the
VanMijen fjord on Spitzbergen.
Spitzbergen is the main island in the Svalbard archipelago located between 76o
and 80o North in the Barents Sea. The barotropic tides in the regions around the
Svalbard islands display interesting dynamical features due to the topography of the
surrounding shelf. In particular the shelf slope along the western edges of the Barents
Sea, extending from Norway towards the Fram Straight at the entrance of the Arctic
Ocean, has a profound effect.
The tides in this area have been simulated by various numerical models which cover
the Norwegian, Greenland, Barents Seas and the Arctic Ocean (Gjevik and Straume
1989, Gjevik et al. 1990, 1994, Kowalik and Proshutinsky 1995 and Lyard 1997). The
simulations are based on numerical solutions of Laplace tidal equations with prescribed
input along the boundary towards the North Atlantic and the tide generating force on
the water masses within the model domain included. It has been shown (Gjevik and
Straume 1989) that the incoming tidal waves from the North Atlantic is the most
important factor for the semi-diurnal tides in the Norwegian and the Barents Seas and
that the direct effect of the tide generating force within the basin is of less importance.
The M2 chart (fig. 1) display a well formed amphidromic center southeast of Svalbard.
Three other smaller amphidromic points are also visible. One in the Kara Sea east
of Novaja Zemlja, another at the southwestern side of Novaja Zemlja, and the third
west of Franz Josef Land. The main amphidrome south-east of Svalbard controls the
dynamics of the tide in the central parts of the Barents Sea.
The tidal wave is progressing into the Barents Sea with high amplitudes along the
coast of Finnmark, northern Norway, and increasing amplitude eastwards along the
coasts of Kola, in Russia. At the same time a tidal wave crest is progressing northward
in the deep Norwegian Sea through the Fram Strait and into the Arctic Ocean north
of Svalbard. This wave is partly diffracted around Svalbard and re-enters the Barents
Sea in the straight between Nordaustlandet and Franz Josef Land. The wave leads to a
westward propagating wave south of the Edge Island and over Svalbardbanken between
Svalbard and Bear Island as seen from the structure of the amphidromic point. The
tidal charts for the semi-diurnal components S2 and N2 show a similar structure of contour lines as for M2 , implying that these semi-diurnal tidal waves have nearly the same
dynamic features as M2 . An animation of the propagating M2 tide in the Norwegian
and Barents Seas can be found on the internet site: http://www.math.uio.no/tidepred/
The tidal chart for the diurnal component K1 shows a very different structure, with
1
JA
VA
NO
M
ZE
A
LJ
80o
SVALBARD
KOLA
NO
E
RG
RUSSLAND
500 km
70o
15o
30o
Figure 1: Tidal chart for the dominant semidiurnal component M2 in the Barents Sea. Full drawn
lines are sea level amplitude in centimeter, dotted lines are phase angle relative to Greenwich (Gjevik
et al. 1994).
a large amphidromic point in the Fram Strait between Svalbard and Greenland. Also
the amphidromic structures south of Svalbard are more complex then for the semidiurnal components, with several local amplitude maxima near the shelf edge. This is
a manifestation that the diurnal tide is resonanting with shelf wave modes with nearly
the same period as K1 (Gjevik et al. 1990, 1994, Kowalik and Proshutinsky 1995,
and Kasajima and Marchenko 2001). Although the sea level amplitude of the diurnal
components is small compared to the main semidiurnal component, the diurnal current
oscillations dominates in some locations over the semidiurnal oscillations. Current
oscillations and eddies due to topographic waves are observed in the West-Spitzbergen
Current (WSC) (Nilsen et al. 2006)
Strong tidal currents occur east of Spitsbergen in the Freeman Sound between
the Barents Island and Edge Island, in Heleysundet between the Barents Island and
Nordaustlandet, and also in the Hinlopen Strait between Spitsbergen and Nordaustlandet. This is a result of the almost 180 degree phase difference for the semidiurnal
tide between Storfjorden and the area east of the Barents Island and Edge Island.
Tidal currents are particularly strong over the shallow banks around and northeast
of Bear Island. The current ellipses are nearly circular with a clockwise rotation of the
current vector. Maximum current speed is up to 1.0 m/s which is an exceptional large
current in open ocean.
Near the critical latitude, were the period of the tide coincides with the inertial
period, turbulence and stratification will have a dominant effect on the profile of the
tidal current. The critical latitude for the M2 component is 75o 2.8’ which passes
through the Barents Sea north of Bear Island. Nøst (1994) found that recorded current
data from this area show the expected influence on the tidal current profile in good
2
agreement model predictions.
The tide leads to a tidal induced clockwise circulation around Bear Island where
particles will circumvent the island in 6-8 days. This has been documented both from
observations (Vinje et al. 1989) and model studies (Gjevik et al. 1994, Kowalik and
Proshutinsky 1995).
Internal waves are frequently generated due to tidal forcing both in situations with
shallow density stratification due to fresh water in the melting season and along more
permanent deep density interfaces along the shelf slope. An example to the latter is the
interface between the relatively warm water in the WSC and the cold bottom water.
References
Gjevik, B., and T. Straume, (1989), Model simulation of the M2 and the K1 tide in
the Nordic Seas and the Arctic ocean. Tellus 41A, pp. 73–96.
Gjevik, B., (1990) Model simulations of tides and shelf waves along the shelves of the
Norwegian-Greenland-Barents Seas. In: Modelling Marine Systems Ed. A.M. Davies,
CRC Press Inc. Vol. I, pp. 187-219.
Gjevik, B., E. Nøst and T. Straume, (1994), Model simulations of the tides in the
Barents Sea. J. Geophysical Res., Vol 99, No C2, 3337–3350.
Y. Kasajima and A. Marchenko (2001) On the excitation of resonant double Kelvin
waves in the Barents Sea opening. Polar Research, Vol. 20 (2), 241-248.
Kowalik, Z. and A. Yu. Proshutinsky, (1995), Topographic enhancement of tidal motion
in the western Barents Sea. J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 100, no. C2, 2613-2637.
Lyard, F. H., (1997) The tides in the Arctic Ocean from a finite element model. J.
Geophys. Res., Vol. 102, no. C7, 15611-15638.
F. Nilsen, B. Gjevik, and U. Schauer (2006), Cooling of the West Spitsbergen Current:
Isopycnal diffusion by topographic vorticity waves, Journal of Geophysical Research,
Vol. 111, C08012, doi:10.1029/2005JC002991.
Nøst, E., (1994) Calculating tidal current profiles from vertically integrated models
near the critical latitude in the Barents Sea J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 99, no. C4, 78857901.
Støylen, E., and Weber, J. E (2008) Mean mass transport induced by internal Kelvin
waves, with application to the circulation in the VanMijen fjord in Svalbard. Abstract,
this workshop.
Vinje. T., H. Jensen, A. S. Johnsen, S. Løset, S. E. Hamran, S. M. Løvas , and
B. Erlingsson, (1989), IDAP-89 R/V Lance deployment. Vol. 2; Field observations
and analysis. Norwegian Polar Research Institute, Oslo and SINTEF/NHL,Trondheim
80pp.
3