* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Neuromonitoring for Spine Surgery
Single-unit recording wikipedia , lookup
Neural engineering wikipedia , lookup
Stimulus (physiology) wikipedia , lookup
Environmental enrichment wikipedia , lookup
Clinical neurochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Neuroplasticity wikipedia , lookup
Neuropsychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Transcranial direct-current stimulation wikipedia , lookup
Persistent vegetative state wikipedia , lookup
End-plate potential wikipedia , lookup
Embodied language processing wikipedia , lookup
Premovement neuronal activity wikipedia , lookup
Neuromuscular junction wikipedia , lookup
Electromyography wikipedia , lookup
Time perception wikipedia , lookup
Sensory substitution wikipedia , lookup
Feature detection (nervous system) wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive neuroscience of music wikipedia , lookup
Neuroregeneration wikipedia , lookup
Microneurography wikipedia , lookup
Neuromonitoring for Spine Surgery Aim: To ensure the integrity of the spinal cord and nerve roots especially at the site of surgery, while providing safe and adequate anesthesia. The Problem: The nervous system is suppressed by anesthetics, hypothermia, hypotension and anemia; depending on anatomical site, specific drug & dose, site of stimulation, and site of monitoring. Discuss the monitoring plan and anesthetic techniques with the surgeon AND the neuromonitoring team prior to starting the case. EMG: The EMG assesses the integrity of cranial/spinal nerve roots and indirectly peripheral nerves from the site of stimulation to the muscle. Anesthetic Implications. Avoid neuromuscular blocking drugs during the period of monitoring i.e. after intubation and positioning. High dose vapor may have a suppressive effect, and may skew sensory vs motor nerve root thresholds. Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEP): SSEPs monitor the integrity of sensory pathways from peripheral nerves to the sensory cortex. Disruption along any part of this pathway may disrupt normal SSEP responses. Anesthetic Implications. SSEPs are progressively suppressed by inhaled anesthetic (vapor or N2O) > 0.5 MAC. All intravenous agents (propofol, barbiturates, midazolam, opioids, ketamine) have minimal effect and are preferred. Standard dose neuromuscular blockers can be used. Auditory Evoked Potentials (AEP): AEPs monitor the integrity of auditory pathways from ear through brain stem to cortex. They are also referred to as brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP or BAER). Anesthetic Implications. Similar to SSEP but are much less sensitive to inhaled anesthetics so that most anesthetic options are acceptable. Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP): MEPs involve transcranial motor cortex stimulation to elicit a response from muscles and thereby assess the integrity of motor pathways. Anesthetic Implications. MEPs are easily suppressed by inhaled anesthetics (vapor > N2O). These should usually be kept to a minimum or not used. In patients with preexisting neuropathy <0.3MAC is preferred while in patients without neuropathy <0.5MAC is usually acceptable. IV hypnotics are less suppressive. Propofol up to 120 mcg/kg/min is usually acceptable. Ketamine & etomidate have minimal effect or increase amplitude. There is insufficient literature about dexmedetomidine but it seems to work well in many patients. Last revised 10/2007 Gelb