Download Transformer Notes

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Mercury-arc valve wikipedia , lookup

Tube sound wikipedia , lookup

Islanding wikipedia , lookup

Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup

Power inverter wikipedia , lookup

Nominal impedance wikipedia , lookup

Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup

Ohm's law wikipedia , lookup

Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Ground (electricity) wikipedia , lookup

Power engineering wikipedia , lookup

Current source wikipedia , lookup

Zobel network wikipedia , lookup

Surge protector wikipedia , lookup

Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup

Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup

Tesla coil wikipedia , lookup

Inductor wikipedia , lookup

Rectifier wikipedia , lookup

Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup

Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Earthing system wikipedia , lookup

Single-wire earth return wikipedia , lookup

Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup

Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup

Magnetic core wikipedia , lookup

Distribution management system wikipedia , lookup

Buck converter wikipedia , lookup

Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup

Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup

History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup

Resonant inductive coupling wikipedia , lookup

Alternating current wikipedia , lookup

Transformer wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
TRANSFORMERS
Vs is and alternating voltage - this so as to setup a flux  in the core.
This can be seen from Faraday's law
d
d
e V 
N
dt
dt
Where e is the voltage set up by the varying flux.
Now we know that the flux varies as a sinusoid.
 = maxsin(t)
Therefore
Therefore
d ( max sin  t )
dt
 N  max cos  t
e N
 N  max sin(

2
  t)
From the above analysis we can see that the voltage lags the flux by 90 degrees
A non-ideal transformer has eddy current losses in the core, and resistive losses in its
primary and secondary windings. In addition the core of the transformer requires some
finite mmf for its magnetization. Also not all the flux links the primary and secondary
windings, in other words there exists leakage flux in the windings.
Using all this information on the no ideal transformer we could develop the equivalent
circuit shown below for it.
In the above diagram the circuit components used are used to represent the various losses
stated above. The relationship between circuit component and loss is detailed below.
Ro => This resistor represents the hysteresis and eddy-current losses. These losses are
directly dependent on the input voltage, as can be seen by its position.
Xm => This inductor represents the magnetization reactance - that minimum mmf
required for the magnetization of the transformer core.
R1 and R2 - These resistors represent the resistive losses (I2R) present in the windings of
the primary and secondary sides of the transformer.
X1 and X2 - These represent the leakage reactance arising from leakage fluxes in the
primary and secondary windings.
On No Load conditions we have the familiar relations
To make the equivalent circuit of the transformer a little simpler we can merge the
resistive and inductive components of the windings as shown in the diagram below:
In the diagram shown I => current required to magnetize the core (flux per turn)
So for N1 turns on the primary side; total flux = N1
as shown previously (t) = maxsint
Therefore d/dt = maxcost
V1 = N1maxcost
Using the equivalent circuit we can see that the load losses in the transformer can be
given by
I12R1 + I22R2
General points to remember: when going to the HV side, impedances go up
when going to the LV side impedances go down
Any side can be treated as the primary, all the must be
done is that the turns ratio should be adjusted to suit.
Paralleling of transformers
Say we had a situation as depicted such. A plant demanded a load of 250kVA. To
account for this load the electricity commission installed a 300kVA transformer at the
location of the plant, which served well to supply power to the plant. But say in the future
the planted decided to expand and logically it demanded a greater load from the lines, say
500kVA. The electricity commission has two choices on how to deal with the plant. It
could replace the old transformer with a new one capable of handling the new demand.
Or it could add another transformer, which would be able to comfortable handle the extra
200kVA, demanded.
The second option is the more feasible one as a smaller transformer needs to be need be
purchased which is much cheaper than the purchase of a brand new big transformer.
In paralleling transformers, however, some basic rules need to be followed.
Obviously the voltage and turns ratio need to be the same otherwise what would occur is
that one transformer (the one with the higher secondary voltage) would be driving current
into the other transformer. Similar R / X ratio in relation to the transformer size must be
observed. And the polarity must be the same for both. The diagram below shows the
effect of ignoring polarity.
Base Values
In practice transformers come with various voltage turn ratios and various VA ratings,
and these transformers would at times need to be used in the same system. When dealing
with situations such as these, analyzing impedance values is problematic. What is done is
that a base VA rating, and voltage are used to which all values on all the transformers are
referred. The base VA rating is defined as sb, and is expressed in per unit (pu).
So Vb x Ib = sb
From this equation we can get the following relationships.
Zb = Vb / Ib
Ib = sb / Vb
Impedance of T/F pu = Actual Impedance / Base Impedance
For example say we had a 10MVA transformer with turns ratio 66/11 on an 11kV system.
Then Zb = Vb2 / sb = 11x103 / 10x103 = 12.1
Actual Z = 1.21 (say this were given),
Then pu Z = 1.21 / 12.1 = 0.1pu