Download Osteoporosis – McCord

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Prenatal testing wikipedia , lookup

Forensic epidemiology wikipedia , lookup

Dental emergency wikipedia , lookup

Multiple sclerosis research wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Scott McCord, PGY 2
What is it?
 “A common disease that is characterized by low bone
mass, microarchitectural disruption, and skeletal
fragility, resulting in an increased risk of fracture”
 Also defined as a value for bone mineral density 2.5 or
more standard deviations below the young adult
female reference mean (T-score less than or equal to 2.5 SD) on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Epidemiology – How Common Is It?
 Stats from International
Osteoporosis Foundation
cited from medical
literature:
 Worldwide: 8.9 million
osteoporotic fractures
annually, resulting in an
osteoporotic fracture every
3 seconds
 Affects 200 million women
worldwide
 1 in 3 women over 50 will
experience osteoporotic
fractures, as will 1 in 5 men
Pathogenesis
1. Peak bone mass acquisition
 Genetics – minimal contribution
 Ethnic variation – increased BMD in African Americans,
decreased BMD in Asian Americans
 Environmental factors causing impaired bone accrual







Poor growth
Delayed maturation
Malnutrition
Muscle deficits
Decreased physical activity
Chronic inflammation
Medications (glucocorticoids)
2. Old age
Pathogenesis (cont.)
 Balance of bone formation and resorption becomes progressively
negative with increasing age
 Age-related decline in number of osteocytes decreases bone
strength
3. Sex steroid deficiency
 Estrogen or androgen deficiency


Loss of bone due to increased remodeling rate, increased osteoblast and
osteoclast numbers, and increased resorption and formation
Reason for dramatic increase in risk for osteoporosis in post-menopausal
women
4. Glucocorticoid excess (endogenous or pharmacologic)
 Predominant abnormality is decreased bone formation
 Directly suppresses osteoblastogenesis, strongly and rapidly
stimulates osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis, and prolongs the
lifespan of osteoclasts.
5. Oxidized lipids
 Multiple studies show a link between atherosclerosis/CV disease
and osteoporosis
Assessing Risk
 Two primary factors to use in assessing risk for
osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures:
 Bone mineral density (BMD), generally measured using
a DXA scan
 Clinical risk factors independent of BMD
 Most accurate way to assess fracture risk is utilizing
both BMD and clinical risk factors
Measuring Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
 Most commonly done with dual-energy x-ray
absorptiometry (DXA)
 DXA measures bone mineral content (BMC, in grams) and
bone area (BA, in sq cm),
 "areal" BMD in g/cm2 = BMC/BA
 T-score (value used for diagnosis of osteoporosis) is
calculated by subtracting the mean BMD of a young-adult
reference population from the patient's BMD and dividing
by the standard deviation (SD) of young-adult population
 Z-score (used to compare the patient's BMD to a
population of peers) is calculated by subtracting the mean
BMD of an age-, ethnicity-, and sex-matched reference
population from the patient's BMD and dividing by the SD
of the reference population.
 Other methods rarely used: peripheral DXA, quantitative
ultrasound, quantitative CT
Measuring BMD (cont.)
 WHO criteria (T-scores)
only applicable to postmenopausal women and
men age 50 years and
older
 Must use Z-score for premenopausal women and
men less than 50 years
old, as relationship
between BMD and
fracture risk is different
Measuring BMD (cont.)
 Z-score
 Comparison of the patient's BMD to an age-matched
population
 Z-score of -2.0 or lower is considered below the expected
range for age, and should prompt further workup for
coexisting problems that can contribute to osteoporosis
 Cannot make diagnosis of osteoporosis in pre-
menopausal women and men younger than 50 years of
age with BMD from Z-score alone
Risk Factors (independent of BMD)
 Advanced age
 Previous low trauma





fracture
Long-term glucocorticoid
therapy
Low body weight - less
than 58 kg (127 lb)
Family history of hip
fracture
 More fractures occur in
Cigarette smoking
patients with osteopenia
Excess alcohol intake
than osteoporosis
Additional Risk Factors
 Medical diseases: all of these have been associated with
decreased BMD







RA
Inflammatory bowel disease
Celiac disease
Cystic fibrosis
Previous hyperthyroidism
Type I and II DM
CKD and ESRD
 Vitamin D deficiency
 Reduced functional mobility/recurrent falls
 Medications: androgen deprivation agents, aromatase inhibitors,
PPI’s, SSRI’s, TZD’s, anti-convulsants
 Dementia, poor health/frailty
 Previous fractures between the ages of 18-20
 Previous history of breast cancer (due to prior treatment with
anti-hormonals)
Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)
 Introduced in 2008 by WHO task force
 Estimates the 10-year probability of hip fracture and
major osteoporotic fracture (hip, clinical spine,
proximal humerus, or forearm) for untreated patients
between ages 40 and 90 years using easily obtainable
clinical risk factors for fracture and femoral neck BMD
using DXA
 http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/
 Smartphone app: search “FRAX”
When to Screen with DXA
 USPSTF recommends BMD assessment in all women 65 years of
age and older
 BMD screening in postmenopausal women less than 65 years if
one or more risk factors are present
 Routine BMD measurements in premenopausal women is NOT
recommended
 Routine BMD measurements in all men is NOT recommended
by USPSTF, but is recommended in men who have:
 Clinical manifestations of low bone mass, such as radiographic
osteopenia, history of low trauma fractures, and loss of more than
1.5 inches in height
 Risk factors for fracture, such as long-term glucocorticoid therapy,
androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer, hypogonadism,
primary hyperparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism, and intestinal
disorders
Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
 Osteoporosis has no clinical manifestations until there is a
fracture
 Many patients without symptoms assume they do not have
osteoporosis
 Many patients with achy joints/hips/feet assume their symptoms
are due to osteoporosis, which is not likely in the absence of a
fracture, and pain without a fracture is more typical of
osteomalacia
 Vertebral fractures are by far most common, and 2/3 are
asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally on chest or abdominal
xrays
 Hip fractures followed by distal radius (Colles) fracture and next
most common
 Clinical diagnosis can be made by presence of fragility fracture
alone (fractures occurring from a fall from standing height or
less without major trauma). BMD measurement not necessary
for clinical diagnosis
Evaluation
 Initial workup:
 CMP, CBC, 25-OH Vit D, Phos
 If diagnosed by fragility fracture, can get DXA scan later
on a non-urgent basis to obtain BMD and monitor
response to therapy
 If low Z-score, need more extensive workup to r/o
coexisting problems:
 24 hour urine for Ca and Cr, PTH, urinary cortisol
excretion, celiac screen, Mag, TSH, FSH, LH, 1,25-OH
Vit D, SPEP, CRP/ESR, Rf, iron panel
Treatment: When to Treat?
 As per the NOF and WHO, for
postmenopausal women and men aged
50 years and older:
 A hip or vertebral (clinical or
morphometric) fracture
 T-score ≤ -2.5 at the femoral neck or
spine after appropriate evaluation to
exclude secondary causes
 Low bone mass (T-score between -1.0
and -2.5 at the femoral neck or spine)
and a 10-year probability of a hip
fracture ≥ 3% or a 10-year probability
of a major osteoporosis-related
fracture ≥ 20% based on the USadapted WHO algorithm
 Clinicians judgment and/or patient
preferences may indicate treatment
for people with 10-year fracture
probabilities above or below these
levels
Treatment
 Lifestyle modifications should be initiated in all patients
 Diet, exercise, Ca/Vit D supplement, smoking cessation
 Bisphosphonates – inhibit bone resorption, increase bone mass,
reduce the incidence of fractures
 First line pharmacotherapy, correct hypocalcemia and/or vitamin D
deficiency prior to initiation
 Oral preparations:



alendronate (Fosamax), once weekly, cheapest
risedronate (Actonel), once weekly
ibandronate (Boniva), once monthly
 Calcium/vitamin D taken concurrently, but should be taken at least 1
hour after bisphosphonate to avoid interfering with absorption
 IV preparations:



zoledronic acid (Reclast or Zometa), once yearly
ibandronate (Boniva), every 3 months
Use IV in patients not able to tolerate po medicines or dosing requirements, or in
patients with Barrett’s esophagus or strictures/achalasia (po bisphosphonates
contraindicated)
Other treatment options
 Concurrent therapies with




bisphosphonates not recommended,
have not shown benefit over
bisphosphonates alone, are primarily
indicated if patient not able to tolerate
bisphosphonates
SERM – raloxifene or tamoxifen, often
used if concurrent breast cancer
prophylaxis or treatment is needed
Intermittent PTH administration –
stimulates bone formation more than
resorption
Denosumab – monoclonal antibody
against RANKL, reduces
osteoclastogenesis
Estrogen/progestin therapy – only
used for persistent menopausal
symptoms, as they carry increase risk
of breast cancer, stroke, and VTE
Treatment in Men
 Main difference from treatment
in women is that if a man’s
primary cause of osteoporosis is
hypogonadism, testosterone
therapy should in initiated
 Bisphosphonates still first line
for osteoporosis in men who do
not have hypogonadism
 If risk of fracture is very high in
male with hypogonadism, or if
BMD is not improved after 2
years on testosterone therapy,
adding a bisphosphonate to
testosterone therapy is currently
recommended
Monitoring
 No consensus on optimal strategy for monitoring
patients on therapy
 Multiple guidelines published, generally recommend
follow up DXA 2 years after starting therapy
 If improvement seen, can do less frequent
monitoring thereafter
 More frequent monitoring may be needed in
conditions of rapid bone loss (glucocorticoid excess)
References
 UpToDate
 Johnell O and Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide






prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures.
Osteoporos Int 17:1726.
Kanis JA (2007) WHO Technical Report, University of Sheffield,
UK: 66.
Melton LJ, 3rd, Atkinson EJ, O'Connor MK, et al. (1998) Bone
density and fracture risk in men. J Bone Miner Res 13:1915.
Melton LJ, 3rd, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, et al. (1992)
Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner
Res 7:1005.
Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, et al. (2000) Long-term risk of
osteoporotic fracture in Malmo. Osteoporos Int 11:669.
2013 ISCD Official Postions - Adult http://www.iscd.org/officialpositions/2013-iscd-official-positions-adult/
“FRAX calculation tool” http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/index.aspx
Thanks
guys!!