Download Análisis biomecánico y caracterización de la intervención

yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Swedish Work Environment Authority (1998). Ergonomics for the Prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorders. Provisions of the Swedish National Board of Occupational Safety and Health on Ergonomics
for the Prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorders, together with the Board’s General Recommendations
on the implementation of the Provisions. Tech. rep. AFS 1998:1. SOLNA: National Board of
Occupational Safety and Health.
Tafazzol A, Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A, and Parnianpour M (2014). Lumbopelvic rhythm during
forward and backward sagittal trunk rotations: combined in vivo measurement with inertial
tracking device and biomechanical modeling. Clin Biomech 29(1), pp. 7–13.
NASA (2010). Measuring and Test Equipment Specifications. NASA Measurement Quality Assurance
Handbook - ANNEX 3. Technical Standard NASA-HDBK-8739.19-3. Washington DC: National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
Thom R (1969). Topological models in biology. Topology 8(3), pp. 313–335.
Ting LH (2007). Dimensional reduction in sensorimotor systems: a framework for understanding
muscle coordination of posture. Prog Brain Res 165, pp. 299–321.
Ting LH and Chvatal SA (2011). «Decomposing muscle activity in motor tasks». In: Motor Control.
Theories, Experiments and Applications. Ed. by F Danion and ML Latash. New York: Oxford
University Press, pp. 102–138.
Torres-Oviedo G, Macpherson JM, and Ting LH (2006). Muscle synergy organization is robust
across a variety of postural perturbations. J Neurophysiol 96, pp. 1530–1546.
Torres-Oviedo G and Ting LH (2007). Muscle synergies characterizing human postural responses.
J Neurophysiol 98(4), pp. 2144–2156.
Tresch M, Cheung V, and d’Avella A (2006). Matrix factorization algorithms for the identification
of muscle synergies: evaluation on simulated and experimental data sets. J Neurophysiol 95(4),
pp. 2199–2212.
Tunik E, Poizner H, Levin MF, Adamovich SV, Messier J, Lamarre Y, and Feldman AG (2003).
Arm-trunk coordination in the absence of proprioception. Exp Brain Res 153(3), pp. 343–355.
Turvey MT (1977). Contrasting orientations to the theory of visual information processing. Psychol
Rev 84(1), p. 67.
Van der Burg JCE, Kingma I, and Van Dieën JH (2003). Effects of unexpected lateral mass placement
on trunk loading in lifting. Spine 28(8), pp. 764–770.
– (2004). Is the trunk movement more perturbed after an asymmetric than after a symmetric
perturbation during lifting? J Biomech 37(7), pp. 1071–1077.
Van der Burg JCE and Van Dieën JH (2001a). The effect of timing of a perturbation on the execution
of a lifting movement. Hum Mov Sci 20, pp. 243–255.
– (2001b). Underestimation of object mass in lifting does not increase the load on the low back. J
Biomech 34(11), pp. 1447–1453.
Van der Burg JCE, Van Dieën JH, and Toussaint H (2000). Lifting an unexpectedly heavy object:
the effects on low-back loading and balance loss. Clin Biomech 15(7), pp. 469–477.
Van Dieën JH and Looze MP de (1999). Directionality of anticipatory activation of trunk muscles
in a lifting task depends on load knowledge. Exp Brain Res 128(3), pp. 397–404.
Van Dieën JH, Hoozemans MJM, and Toussaint HM (1999). Stoop or squat: a review of biomechanical studies on lifting technique. Clin Biomech 14, pp. 685–696.