* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Symposium Poster - uospur
Multielectrode array wikipedia , lookup
Environmental enrichment wikipedia , lookup
Neuroanatomy wikipedia , lookup
Caridoid escape reaction wikipedia , lookup
Cortical cooling wikipedia , lookup
Central pattern generator wikipedia , lookup
Neural engineering wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive neuroscience of music wikipedia , lookup
Nervous system network models wikipedia , lookup
Emotion and memory wikipedia , lookup
Premovement neuronal activity wikipedia , lookup
Endocannabinoid system wikipedia , lookup
Axon guidance wikipedia , lookup
Synaptic gating wikipedia , lookup
Neural oscillation wikipedia , lookup
Surface wave detection by animals wikipedia , lookup
Clinical neurochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Synaptogenesis wikipedia , lookup
Metastability in the brain wikipedia , lookup
Evoked potential wikipedia , lookup
Emotional lateralization wikipedia , lookup
Visual extinction wikipedia , lookup
Development of the nervous system wikipedia , lookup
Neural coding wikipedia , lookup
Perception of infrasound wikipedia , lookup
Neuropsychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Sensory cue wikipedia , lookup
Time perception wikipedia , lookup
Olfactory memory wikipedia , lookup
Channelrhodopsin wikipedia , lookup
Psychophysics wikipedia , lookup
C1 and P1 (neuroscience) wikipedia , lookup
Feature detection (nervous system) wikipedia , lookup
Olfactory bulb wikipedia , lookup
Stereo-olfaction in Mouse Olfactory Navigation PATRICK BROWN University of Oregon (Smear Lab) Stereo-olfaction is a sensory process, wherein inputs from left and right olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) are compared in order to sense the direction of an odor gradient1. In this project, we are studying how stereo-olfactory signals are neurally encoded. Odorant stimuli are difficult to control, so we are using optogenetics to investigate this process. Using optogenetics, we can precisely control the timing and amplitude of activity in the glomeruli, in which OSNs form synapses with neurons of the olfactory bulb. Thus, we can ask whether mice can perceive bilateral differences in timing and amplitude2. Background • Odorant ligands bind to odorant receptors expressed by OSNs. • OSNs that express the same odorant receptor project to a single glomerulus, where they synapse with mitral and tufted cells, which project axons to the cortex. • The glomeruli are arranged spatially in a stereotyped manner, forming identical maps in the left and right olfactory bulbs. Thus, each type of glomerulus is present on the two sides. • Mitral and tufted cells project to the anterior olfactory nucleus in a topographic manner; neurons in the nucleus synapse near the corresponding contralateral glomerulus. A precise circuit links the left and right olfactory bulbs. Methods We use a transgenic mouse that expresses ChannelRhodopsin-2 in M72-expressing OSNs. https://www.face book.com/topic/ Behavioral paradigm ClaireKittrell/2876046 34763485?sourc e=whfrt&position =2&trqid=63146 4282020860343 4 Trial structure SurgeryRecoveryHandlingWater RestrictionLick TrainingPinene DetectionLeft Laser DetectionRight Laser DetectionRight=Go/Left=NoGo Bilateral Timing Difference or Bilateral Amplitude Difference Mice are trained to lick when the left stimulus precedes the right by 100ms, and to not lick when the right stimulus precedes the left. We will incrementally reduce the gap between the bilateral stimuli, in order to determine their acuity for timing differences. Similarly, simultaneous stimuli will be presented with differences in amplitude in order to isolate sensitivity to bilateral differences in neural activity3. The bilateral stimuli are presented immediately following inhalation to ensure that they occur within the same sniff, simulating odorevoked activity. Conclusions This work suggests that timing cues at the glomerular level are sufficient for stereoolfactory discrimination Future directions • Mice can differentiate between unilateral stimuli presented at different times in the sniff; we need to control for the possibility that they are identifying lick and no-lick trials in this way4. Therefore, it will be necessary to randomize the time position of the stimulus relative to sniffing. Results Stimulation of these neurons with blue light evokes neuronal activity, as would the M72 receptor’s odor ligands. Thus far, we have tested two mice in the stereotiming task, where they discriminate between leftthen-right and right-then-left stimuli. One of those mice has consistently demonstrated the ability to discriminate between left-first and right-first stimuli with a 100ms timing gap. This mouse has also performed above chance (greater than 50%) for a 50ms timing gap. • https://www.face book.com/topic/ Learning Curve for Stereo-olfactory Discrimination Task ClaireKittrell/2876046 34763485?sourc e=whfrt&position =2&trqid=63146 4282020860343 Acknowledgements 4 90 80 Percent Trials Correct Introduction Training sequence 70 .We will reduce the timing gap in order to determine the acuity of mice to timing cues. • We will also investigate their sensitivity to bilateral differences in amplitude, and determine if amplitude differences are sufficient for stereo-olfaction. • Finally, we will determine the relationship between amplitude and timing differences. We hypothesize that presenting stimuli that differ in both timing and amplitude will improve the accuracy of stereo-olfactory discrimination. 60 50 40 References 30 20 10 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Session This research was funded by the NICHD Summer Research Program at the University of Oregon (NIH-R25HD070817). Additional thanks to Dr. Matthew Smear, Dr. Roma Shusterman, Rachael Alionhart, Teresa Findley, Kassina Kim-Hayes, and Rosanna Borsoni. 16 1. Rajan, R., Clement, J. P. & Bhalla, U. S. Rats smell in stereo. Science 311, 666–670 (2006). 2. Smear, M., Resulaj, A., Zhang, J., Bozza, T. & Rinberg, D. Multiple perceptible signals from a single olfactory glomerulus. Nature Publishing Group 16, 1687–1691 (2013). 3. Smear, M. C. Beyond localization of function: dissecting a neural code with optogenetics in New Techniques in Systems Neuroscience 271–292 (Springer International Publishing, 2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12913-6_10 4. Smear, M., Shusterman, R., O’connor, R., Bozza, T. & Rinberg, D. Perception of sniff phase in mouse olfaction. Nature 479, 397–400 (2011).