Download Thunderstorms, Lightning and Climate Change

yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

29th International Conference on
Lightning Protection
23 – 26th June 2008 – Uppsala, Sweden
Thunderstorms, Lightning and Climate Change
Colin Price
Tel Aviv University
[email protected]
Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel
Abstract - The distribution of lightning around the planet is directly linked to the Earth's climate, which is
driven by solar insolation. On the diurnal scale, lightning activity in the tropics peaks a few hours after the peak
solar heating. On a seasonal scale, lightning activity peaks a few months after the peak annual solar heating.
And globally, due to the continental asymmetry between the hemispheres, more lightning activity occurs in the
northern hemisphere summer relative to the southern hemisphere summer. However, it now appears that
anthropogenic activity on the planet is changing the equilibrium state of the climate. With recent projections of
a warmer world in the future, one of the key questions is related to the impact of global warming on
thunderstorms, and other severe weather. Will lightning activity increase in a warmer world? Will we have
more intense storms? If changes in lightning activity occur, this too may have an impact on the Earth's climate.
Lightning is a major source of nitrogen oxides (NOx) in the atmosphere, which are a precursor for ozone (O3)
production in the troposphere. Since O3 is also a greenhouse gas, changes in lightning activity may result in an
additional warming (positive feedback) on the climate system. Lightning also supplies important information
about the intensity of convection, which is related to other important climate parameters. Hence, by monitoring
global lightning activity we may be able to track changes in numerous parameters that are important in the
climate change debate.
Lightning discharges in thunderstorms are an indication of the intensity of atmospheric convection. Atmospheric
convection occurs under unstable atmospheric conditions, either due to the heating of the boundary layer by solar
radiation during the day, or by the mixing of air masses of different densities. Lightning frequencies are therefore
related to the regions of greatest instability in the Earth's atmosphere. These regions of instability do not occur
randomly around the planet, but have an organized pattern related to the climate of the Earth which is driven by the
differential heating of the Earth's surface by the sun. If we change the climate we will change the regions of
convection, their intensity, and hence will likely change the lightning patterns around the globe.
In the last decade we have learned a great deal about the spatial and temporal patterns of global lightning and
thunderstorms from both satellite and ground-based observations. The two primary satellite sensors that have been
used are the Optical Transient Detector (OTD) and the Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS) (Christian et al., 2003), while
key ground-based global observations of lightning have been based on Schumann resonance methods (Price and
Melnikov, 2004; Price et al., 2007).
The distribution of global thunderstorms is directly linked to the Earth's climate, and more specifically, the general
circulation of the atmosphere. The maximum solar heating at the surface in the tropics results in rising thermals and
vertical mixing in the atmosphere. The region of rising air that occurs along the thermal equator is known as the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) due to the resulting convergence of surface winds from the northern and southern
hemispheres along this boundary. The thermal equator migrates north and south of the geographic equator according to
the seasons, with the thermal equator furthest north in June-August during the northern hemisphere summer, and
furthest south in December-February during the southern hemisphere summer. Due to the different heat capacity of
land versus oceans, the continental regions heat up more rapidly than the oceans, resulting also in longitudinal
differences in the location and width of the ITCZ.
More than 2/3 of global lightning occurs in tropical thunderstorms (Christian et al., 2003). However, a significant
difference in convective intensity is observed between oceanic and continental convection in the tropics (Lemone and
Zipser, 1980; Jorgenson and Lemone, 1989). Updraft velocities in oceanic thunderstorms may reach a maximum of 10
m/s, while over continental regions the updrafts may reach 50 m/s or greater (Price and Rind, 1992; Williams and
Stanfill, 2002; Williams et al., 2004). Since updraft intensity plays a major role in thunderstorm electrification and
lightning frequencies (Baker et al., 1995; 1999), this dramatic difference in thunderstorm dynamics results in the
lightning activity over the oceans being an order of magnitude less than over the continents. In fact the boundary
between land and ocean is very clearly seen in satellite images of tropical lightning activity (Figure 1). Williams et al.
(2004) have re-addressed this difference in land/ocean lightning, considering two opposing hypotheses. The one deals
with the thermal hypothesis where the land surface heats up more rapidly during the day as compared with the oceans,
and hence the instabilities, convection and lightning are more vigorous over the land areas. The other deals with the
aerosol hypothesis, due to the order-of-magnitude difference in the concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)
between the continents and the oceans, that can influence cloud microphysics and the intensity of deep convective
storms. Using islands as miniature continents Williams et al. (2004) concluded that the thermal hypothesis still appears
to be the main cause of the land-ocean contrasts in observed lightning activity.
Figure 1: Seasonal maps of the OTD/LIS satellite- observed lightning (
It should be noted that not all tropical continental thunderstorms are intense lightning generators. The tropical monsoon
periods are characterized by the seasonal onshore flow of moist oceanic air, resulting in heavy rainfall in continental
thunderstorms, however with low lightning rates (Petersen et al., 2002; Williams et al., 2002). This occurs in the Indian
Monsoon, the African Monsoon, the Brazilian Monsoon and the Australian Monsoon. Intense lightning activity prefers
a somewhat dry environment, which may explain the difference between African and South American lightning activity
(Williams and Satori, 2004).
In mid-latitudes, frontal thunderstorms occur at the boundary (front) between different air masses, normally cold-dry
polar air meeting warm-moist tropical air. The greater the density differences between the air masses (temperature and
humidity) the greater the atmospheric instabilities that develop, and the greater the intensity of these storms. The
manifestation of the intensity appears visibly as frequent lightning discharges. Mid-latitude storms generally rotate
around a region of low pressure (anti-clockwise in the northern hemisphere (cyclonic rotation) and clockwise (anticyclonic) in the southern hemisphere), while simultaneously propagating eastward around the globe with the general
westerly flow in the midlatitudes (30-60 degrees latitude) (Price, 2006).
There have been numerous papers in the past few years dealing with the connection between lightning, climate and
climate change. An extensive review of the topic of global climate-lightning connections was given by Williams
(2005), with additional discussion by Price (2006, 2008), and the reader is directed to these papers for further
A. Temperature
Due to the interest in global warming, there have been numerous studies looking at the relationship and sensitivity of
lightning activity to changes in surface temperature. Since long term global lightning observations do not exist,
relationships are normally investigated on shorter time scales. Many time scales have been explored, from diurnal
(Price, 1993; Markson and Price, 1999) and daily variations (Price and Asfur, 2006a), to 5-day waves (Patel, 2001),
intraseasonal (Anyamba et al., 2000) and semiannual variations (Williams, 1994; Satori and Ziegler, 1996; Fullekrug
and Fraser-Smith, 1998; Nickolaenko et al., 1999), and the annual (Heckman et al., 1998; Christian et al., 2003, Toumi
and Qie, 2004) and interannual scales, dominated by the El Nino (Williams, 1992; Reeve and Toumi, 1999; Satori and
Ziegler, 1999). On all these timescales we observe a positive relationships between temperature and lightning, with
lightning increasing anywhere from 10-100% for every one degree surface warming.
Recent studies continue to show the high positive correlation between surface temperatures and lightning activity
(Williams et al., 2005; Price and Asfur, 2006a; Sekiguchi et al., 2006). Figure 2 shows the daily regionally averaged
surface temperatures over Africa compared with the regional lightning activity, based on Schumann resonance
measurements, over a 2-month period (Price and Asfur, 2006a). It is clear that for the tropical lightning centers, surface
temperature is a key driving factor of daily lightning activity. However, there does not appear to be any long term trend
detected in lightning activity over the last fifty years (Price and Asfur, 2006b; Markson, 2007).
Figure 2: Daily regional lightning activity (black) and regional mean surface temperatures over Africa over a 2-month period (from
Price and Asfur, 2006a).
B. Water Vapor
Water vapor in the atmosphere is the primary natural greenhouse gas influencing the climate of the Earth. Since water
vapor absorbs infrared radiations emitted from the Earth's surface, increases in water vapor in a warmer climate would
result in a positive feedback, amplifying the initial warming (Del Genio, 2002). In general, the Earth's climate is
believed to be much more sensitive to changes in water vapor in the upper troposphere, where the concentrations are
naturally very low. Recently it has been shown that thunderstorms deposit large amounts of water in the upper
troposphere, moistening of the upper tropospheric environment (Price, 2000; Price and Asfur, 2006a), with important
consequences for the Earth's climate (Rind, 1998). Figure 3 shows the relationship between daily lightning activity
over Africa, based on Schumann resonance measurements, and the specific humidity in the upper troposphere (300
hPa). The curves have been shifted by 24 hours to show the agreement, however, the lightning peaks one day before
the peak humidity fields in the upper troposphere. The lightning activity is a means of monitoring the intensity of deep
convection, and hence is well correlated with the vertical transport of water vapor by thunderstorms into the upper
Related to water vapor, Sato and Fukunishi (2005) showed a connection between tropical lightning activity and high
cloud coverage in the tropics, while strong connections between lightning and upper tropospheric ice water content
(Petersen et al., 2005) and ice crystal size (Sherwood et al., 2006) have recently been demonstrated. Water vapor,
cloud cover, ice water content, and ice particle size all have direct impacts on the Earth's radiation balance, and
therefore lightning may supply an important tool for studying the variability and changes in these important climate
Figure 3: The daily relationship between lightning activity (black) and upper troposphere specific humidity (300 hPa) over Africa
during a 2-month period. The lightning curve has been shifted forward one day to show the excellent agreement (from Price and
Asfur, 2006a).
C. Tropospheric Chemistry
Lightning itself can influence the climate via the production of nitrogen oxides (NO + NO2 = NOx) followed by the
production of ozone, another efficient greenhouse gas. A comprehensive review of this topic is given by Schumann
and Huntrieser (2007), with references therein. Recent field experiments such as TROCCINOX (Huntriesser et al.,
2007) show greatly enhanced NOx concentrations in thunderstorm anvils, with enhanced ozone concentrations
downwind. Ryu and Jenkins (2005) and Grewe (2007) have also shown the significant influence of lightning on
tropospheric ozone concentrations.
The global amount of NOx produced by lightning and thunderstorms is still highly uncertain. There are a wide variety
of lightning flashes and thunderstorms, and therefore measurements in individual field experiments may not be reliable
for extrapolating globally. It is also difficult to assign a certain concentration of NOx in a specific storm to a specific
lightning discharge. Even if this was possible, the important parameters of the lightning discharge (energy, length,
peak current, tortuosity, altitude, number of return strokes, etc.) are needed in order to extrapolate the results to other
lightning discharges around the globe. Nevertheless, lightning is believed to be the largest source of NOx in the upper
troposphere, where lifetimes of a few days result in NOx playing an important role modulating the Earth's climate
(Price et al., 1997).
There is solid evidence that global temperatures are increasing, and the cause is very likely due to the increasing
anthropogenic greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (IPCC, 2007). However, since we do not know how lightning and
thunderstorms will react to a warmer world, we need to either use climate change proxies from the present and past, or
we need to run computer simulations of how global warming may impact thunderstorms in a future climate. There are
numerous caveats regarding the use of present day climate variations as proxies for future climate change. Lindzen et
al. (1995) has discussed the problems of using the annual cycle as a proxy for future climate change. Furthermore,
regional climate variability such as the ENSO cycle is more related to shifts in circulation patterns in the atmosphere
than changes in temperature. Hence, we need to be cautious when extrapolating present day variability to future global
With that said, we now have a decade of measurements of lightning from space. The Tropical Rain Measuring Mission
(TRMM) satellite has provided great insights into global lightning distributions (Christian et al., 2003), allowing us to
examine the relationship between lightning and Earth's climate. It is well known that global lightning is divided
between the three hot-spots, or chimneys, over the tropical land masses (Africa, South America and Southeast Asia)
(Figure 1), while tropical precipitation is more continuous around the tropics following the intertropical convergence
zone (ITCZ) (Price, 2008). We also know that the three thunderstorm chimneys are ranked 1) Africa, 2) South
America and 3) Southeast Asia, from the most active to the least active regions. However, the opposite trend is
observed for precipitation, with the chimneys ranked 1) Southeast Asia, 2) South America, and 3) Africa. On a
regional annual mean climate scale, less precipitation implies more lightning, which appears contradictory (Price,
Williams and Satori (2004) looked into this difference in more detail, examining the differences between tropical
Africa and tropical South America. They showed that the main difference between Africa and South American
lightning activity was due to African being hotter and drier than South America. The greater continentality of Africa is
attributed to its greater elevation above sea level, and to the asymmetry of the synoptic scale delivery of moisture to the
region. In addition, Williams et al. (2005) showed that as the height of thunderstorm cloud base increased, so did the
lightning activity. Higher cloud base implies drier surface conditions, which would support these observations. Carey
and Buffalo (2007) also recently demonstrated that thunderstorms with predominantly positive lightning (often
associated with severe weather) were more likely in a drier environment.
This apparent paradox also appears evident on the ENSO timescales (Hamid et al., 2001) where during the strong El
Nino of 1997-8 severe drought conditions persisted across Indonesia, while the lightning activity increased by 57%.
This could occur if we had fewer thunderstorms, with each thunderstorm more vigorous, producing more lightning, or
possibly by raising the cloud base, promoting the mixed phase electrification (Williams et al., 2002) with less warm
rain production (Williams et al., 2005). In support of this, Hamid et al. (2001) showed that the thunderstorms during
the drier El Nino period had greater vertical development, while the mixed-phase precipitation zones were thicker.
When looking at modeling studies of global warming scenarios, the recent IPCC report (IPCC, 2007) presents results
from more than 20 different models, together with the responses of these models to rising concentrations of greenhouse
gases. As related to tropical convection and lightning, once again a paradox arises. All models show that the greatest
warming due to increasing greenhouse gases will occur not at the surface, but in the equatorial upper troposphere. The
reason for this is that the models predict a moistening of the upper troposphere, due to enhanced deep convection in the
tropics, and this extra water vapor in the upper troposphere is a strong greenhouse gas, absorbing infrared radiation
emitted from the Earth's surface. However, if the upper atmosphere is warmed relative to the surface, the atmospheric
lapse rate (dT/dz) becomes more stable, tending to inhibit future convection. So we would expect that the stabilization
of the atmosphere as the climate warms would reduce the amount of thunderstorms, and hence lightning.
However, numerous climate model simulations have shown that lightning activity will increase in a warmer climate
(Price and Rind, 1994; Grenfell et al., 2003; Shindell et al., 2006). Although the parameterizations of lightning in
global climate models are quite crude (Price and Rind, 1992; Allen and Pickering, 2000; Futyan and Del Genio, 2007),
the models nevertheless manage to duplicate the present global lightning climatologies (Shindell et al., 2006). All of
these modeling studies indicate an approximate 10% increase in lightning activity globally for every 1 K global
warming, with most of the increase occurring in the tropics, exactly where we expect the atmosphere to become more
stable. This paradox was dealt with in more depth by Del Genio et al. (2007) where they showed that in a doubled-CO2
climate the updrafts strengthen by ~1m/s, due to a rise in the height of the freezing level in the model. They showed
that in certain regions, such as the western United States, the drying in a warmer climate reduces the frequency of
thunderstorms, but the strongest storms occur 26% more often. In other words, the drier climate produces less
thunderstorms overall, but those storms that do develop are more intense in a warmer climate. This agrees with recent
observations (Williams et al., 2005) showing increased electrification in the drier regions of the Great Plains of the
United States.
It is clear that the spatial and temporal distributions of lightning activity on Earth are governed by the climate itself.
The diurnal solar heating, the latitudinal temperature gradient, the general circulation of the atmosphere, the location of
regions of convergence and divergence, static and baroclinic instabilities, etc., all influence the global distributions of
thunderstorms. In addition, we know that thunderstorms track the motion of the sun during the seasons, with most
lightning activity being in the summer hemisphere.
On short time scales (hourly, daily, monthly and annual) there appears to be a robust positive correlation between
tropical lightning activity and surface temperature, upper tropospheric water vapor, cloud cover, and anvil ice content.
Whether these relationships hold on longer time scales is still uncertain, although climate models do support the
positive correlation between lightning and global temperatures.
Since lightning can be monitored easily, and continuously, from ground networks, lightning may become a useful tool
for monitoring changes in important climate parameters in the future. Furthermore, lightning itself is an important
source of nitrogen oxides (NOx) in the atmosphere, with implications for ozone production, and the Earth's radiation
balance. Lightning is likely the major source of NOx in the upper troposphere.
On climatic scales, when considering the tropical continental centers of lightning activity, they rank in the opposite
order when considering lightning and precipitation. While Africa has the highest lightning activity of the three
chimney regions, it has the lowest rainfall, while being the hottest. When we look at the impact of the ENSO cycle on
tropical lightning and rainfall, a similar negative relationship is observed, with hot drought-stricken Southeast Asia
during the El Nino years having more lightning than during the wetter cooler La Nina periods. Hence, when
considering lightning-climate relationships, we need to also consider the moisture availability and not only temperature.
Climate models provide some insight into this paradox that shows more lightning with less rainfall, since they too
predict increasing lightning activity as the climate warms and dries. Both regionally and globally climate models
predict increases in lightning activity in a warmer climate, even though the atmosphere becomes more stable and the
surface tends to dry as the climate warms.
All of these relationships showing less rainfall associated with more lightning may be explained if drier climates have
fewer thunderstorms, with each storm being more intense. This is what model studies show happens in a warmer
climate. This has also now been documented in the Mediterranean region over the past 50 years, where the total
rainfall has been decreasing, while the intense rainfall events have been increasing (Alpert et al., 2002).
Previous studies have indicated that increased lightning activity will moisten the upper troposphere (Price, 2000; Price
and Asfur, 2006). Hence, a drier surface resulting in a wetter upper atmosphere also appears to present a contradiction.
However, the upper troposphere is naturally extremely dry, and therefore increasing the intensity of thunderstorms in a
drier climate will indeed moisten the upper troposphere. This enhanced moistening is what drives the maximum
warming in climate models in a double-CO2 world.
One factor that has not been addressed here is the role of aerosols in thunderstorms electrification. It is possible that
drier climates result in more suspended aerosols and cloud condensation nuclei, hence influencing cloud microphysics
and cloud electrification (Williams et al., 2002). However, it should be pointed out that all model simulations discussed
here do not include any aerosol effects on lightning, and address only thermodynamic changes in their simulations.
Whether aerosol effects would enhance these changes is a topic for future studies.
Allen, D.J., and K.E. Pickering, 2002: Evaluation of lightning flash rate parameterizations for use in a global chemical
transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 107 (D23), 4711, doi:10.1029/2002JD002066.
Alpert, P., T. Ben-Gai, A. Baharad, Y. Benjamini, D. Yekutieli, M. Colacino, L. Diodato, C. Ramis, V. Homar, R.
Romero, S. Michaelides and A. Manes, 2002: The paradoxical increase of Mediterranean extreme daily rainfall
in spite of decrease in total values, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 11, 31-1 - 31-4.
Anyamba, E., E.R. Williams, J. Susskind, A. Fraser-Smith, M. Fullekrug, 2000: The manifestation of the MaddenJulian oscillation in global deep convection and in the Schumann resonance intensity, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 10291044.
Baker, M.B., H.J. Christian and J. Latham: A computational study of the relationships linking lightning frequency and
other thundercloud parameters, Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc., 121, 1525-1548, 1995.
Baker, M.B., A.M. Blyth, H.J. Christian, J. Latham, K.L. Miller and A.M. Gadian: Relationship between lightning
activity and various thundercloud parameters: Satellite and modeling studies, Atmos. Res., 51, 221-236, 1999.
Carey, L.D, and K.M Buffalo, 2007: Environmental Control of Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Polarity in Severe Storms,
Mon. Wea. Rev., 135(4), 1327–1353.
Christian, H.J.R.J. Blakeslee, D.J. Boccippio, W.L. Boeck et al.: Global frequency and distribution of lightning as
observed from space by the Optical Transient Detector, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4005,
doi:10.1029/2002JD002347, 2003.
Del Genio, A.D. 2002: The dust settles on water vapor feedback. Science 296, 665-666.
Del Genio, A.D., Y. Mao-Sung and J. Jonas, 2007: Will moist convection be stronger in a warmer climate? Geophys.
Res. Lett., 34, L16703, doi:10.1029/2007GL030525.
Fullekrug, M., and A. Fraser-Smith, 1998: Global lightning and climate variability inferred from ELF field variations,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 2411-2414.
Futyan, J.M., and A.D. Del Genio, 2007: Relationships between lightning and properties of convective cloud clusters,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L15705, doi:10.1029/2007GL030227.
Grenfell, J.L., D.T. Shindell and V. Grewe, 2003: Sensitivity studies of oxidative changes in the troposphere in 2100
using the GISS GCM, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 3, 1805-1842.
Grewe, V., 2007: Impact of climate variability on tropospheric ozone, Sci. Total Environ., 374(1), 167-181.
Hamid, E.Y., Z. Kawasaki and R. Mardiana, 2001: Impact of the 1997-98 El Nino on lightning activity over Indonesia,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 147-150.
Heckman, S., E. Williams and B. Boldi, 1998: Total global lightning inferred from Schumann resonance mesurements,
J. Geophys. Res., 103, 31775-31779.
Huntriesser et al., 2007: Lightning-produced NOx over Brazil during TROCCINOX: Airborne measurements in
tropical and subtropical thunderstorms and the importance of mesoscale convective systems, Amos. Chem. Phys.
Discuss., 7, 2561-2621.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. World
Meteorological Organization (WMO) and UN Environment Programme (UNEP).
Jorgenson, D.P., and M.A. Lemone: Vertical velocity in oceanic convection off tropical Australia, J. Atmos. Sci., 51,
3183-3193, 1989.
Lemone, M.A., and E.J. Zipser: Cumulonimbus vertical velocity events in GATE. Part I: Diameter, intensity and mass
flux, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 2444-2457, 1980.
Lindzen, R.S., B. Kirtman, D. Kirk-Davidoff and E.K. Schneider, 1995: Seasonal surrogate for climate, J. Climate, 8,
Markson, R., 2007: The global circuit intensity: Its measurement and variation over the last 50 years, Bull. Amer.
Meteor. Soc., 88, 1-19.
Markson, R., and C. Price, 1999: Ionospheric potential as a proxy index for global temperatures, Atmos. Res., 51, 309314.
Nickolaenko, A.P., M. Hayakawa and Y. Hobara, 1999: Long-term periodical variations in global lightning activity
deduced from Schumann resonance monitoring, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 27585-27591.
Patel, A., 2001: Modulation of African lightning and rainfall by the global five day wave, MSc thesis, Dept. of
Mechanical Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 176pp.
Petersen, W.A., S.W. Nesbitt, R.J. Blakeslee, R. Cifeli, P. Hein and S.A. Rutledge, 2002: TRMM observations of
intraseasonal variability in convective regimes over the Amazon, J. Clim., 15, 1278-1294.
Petersen, W.A., H.J. Christian and S.A. Rutledge, 2005: TRMM observations of the global relationship between ice
water content and lightning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L14819, doi:10.1029/2005GL023236.
Price, C., 1993: Global surface temperatures and the atmospheric electrical circuit, Geophys. Res. Lett.,20, 1363-1366.
Price, C.: Evidence for a link between global lightning activity and upper tropospheric water vapor, Nature, 406, 290293, 2000.
Price, C., 2006: Global thunderstorm activity, in Sprites, Elves and Intense Lightning Discharges, M. Fullekrug et al.
(eds.), Springer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 85-99.
Price, C., 2008: Will a drier climate result in more lightning? Atmos. Res., in press.
Price, C., and D. Rind, 1992: A simple lightning parameterization for calculating global lightning distributions, J.
Geophy. Res., 97, 9919-9933.
Price, C., and D. Rind, 1994: Possible implications of global climate change on global lightning distributions and
frequencies , J. Geophys. Res., 99, 10823-10831.
Price, C., J. Penner and M. Prather, 1997: NOx From Lightning, Part I: Global Distribution Based on Lightning
Physics, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 5929-5941.
Price, C., and A. Melnikov, 2004: Diurnal, seasonal and inter-annual variations in the Schumann Resonance
parameters, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 66, 1179-1185.
Price, C., and M. Asfur, 2006a: Can lightning observations be used as an indicator of upper-tropospheric water vapor
variability? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87, 291–298.
Price, C., and M. Asfur, 2006b: Long term trends in lightning activity over Africa, Earth Planets Space, 58, 1-5.
Price, C., O. Pechony and E. Greenberg, 2007: Schumann resonances in lightning research, J. of Lightning Res., 1, 115.
Reeve, N., and R. Toumi, 1999: Lightning activity as an indicator of climate change, Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc., 125,
Rind, D., 1998: Just add water vapor, Science, 281, 1152.
Ryu, J.H., and G.S. Jenkins, 2005: Lightning-tropospheric ozone connections: EOF analysis of TCO and lightning data,
Atmos. Environ., 39, 5799-5805.
Sato, M., and H. Fukunishi, 2005: New evidence for a link between lightning activity and tropical upper cloud
coverage, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L12807, doi:10.1029/2005GL022865.
Satori, G., and B. Ziegler, 1996: Spectral characteristics of Schumann resonances observed in central Europe, J.
Geophys. Res., 101, 29663-29669.
Satori, G., and B. Ziegler, 1999: El Nino related meridional oscillations of global lightning activity, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 26, 1365-1368.
Schumann, U., and H. Huntrieser, 2007: The global lightning-induced nitrogen oxides source, Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Discuss., 7, 2623-2818.
Sekiguchi, M., M. Hayakawa, A.P. Nickolaenko and Y. Hobara, 2006: Evidence on a link between the intensity of
Schumann resonance and global surface temperature, Ann. Geophys., 24, 1809-1817.
Sherwood, S., V. T.J. Phillips and J.S. Wettlaufer, 2006: Small ice crystals and the climatology of lightning, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 33, L05804, doi:10.1029/2005GL025242.
Shindell, D.T., G. Faluvegi, N. Unger, E. Aguilar, G.A. Schmidt, D.M. Koch, S.E. Bauer and R.L. Miller, 2006:
Simulations of preindustrial, present-day, and 2100 conditions in the NASA GISS composition and climate
model G-PUCCINI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4427-4459.
Toumi, R., and X. Qie, 2004: Seasonal variation of lightning on the Tibetan Plateau: A spring anomaly? Geophs. Res.
Lett., 31, L04115, doi:10.1029/2003GL018930.
Williams, E.R., 1992: The Schumann resonance: a global tropical thermometer, Science, 256, 1184-1187.
Williams, E.R., 1994: Global circuit response to seasonal variations in global surface air temperature, Mon. Wea. Rev.,
122, 1917-1929.
Williams, E.R., 2005: Lightning and climate: A review, Atmos. Res., 76, 272-287.
Williams, E.R., et al.: Contrasting convective regimes over the Amazon, 2002: Implications for cloud electrification, J.
Geophys. Res., LBA Special Issue, 107, D20, 8082, doi:10:1029/2001JD000380.
Williams, E.R., V. Mushtak, D. Rosenfeld, S. Goodman and D. Boccippio, 2005: Thermodynamic conditions favorable
to superlative thunderstorm updraft, mixed phase microphysics and lightning flash rate, Atmos. Res., 76, 288306.
Williams, E.R., and G. Satori, 2004: Lightning, thermodynamic and hydrological comparisons of the two tropical
continental chimneys, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 66, 1213-1231.
Williams, E., and S. Stanfill, 2002: The physical origin of the land-ocean contrast in lightning activity, C. R. Physique,
3, 1277-1292.
Williams, E., T. Chan and D. Boccippio, 2004: Islands as miniature continents: Another look at the land-ocean
lightning contrast, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D16206, doi:10.1029/2003JD003833.
4. weather facts
4. weather facts