Download From meters of clay to nanometers of optical stability.

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
The MAX IV stability approach – From meters
of clay to nanometers of optical stability.
Brian Norsk Jensen, MAX IV Laboratory, 2015
Outline
● Aspects on Mechanical Stability
– Correlated Motions
– Reminder on Illustrative School Book Example
● The MAX IV Stability Criterion
– Accelerator Stability leading to Vibration Level Goal
– Design Goals for Facility Components
● Examples, Results and Practices
–
–
–
–
Design and Characterization of Soft X-Ray Mirror Units
Ring Magnet Stability
Soft X-Ray Monochromator
Other Examples
● Conclusions
2
Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015
Correlated Motions
● We are mainly concerned about Relative Displacements
●
● Sensitivity to Vibrations can be Reduced by increasing Correlation
● The MAX IV Floor is the “Backbone” of our Machines and Beamlines
● Stable Supports Ensure Correlated Motions (in Phase)
● 20nm-30nm RMS, 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐟>𝟓𝐇𝐳
(originating from storage ring considerations)
Illustrations:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/17/Ship_wave_bending.svg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rotating_earth_axial_tiles_to_orbit.gif
3
Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015
The MAX IV “Boat”
Shear Wave Velocities
Concrete, 0.3m, >2400 m/s
Stabilized UGM, 0.3m, 1300 m/s
Low Baltic Clay Till,
2-8m layer,
250-300 m/s
North-East Clay Till,
8-13m layer,
400-650 m/s
Lime Stabilized Soil,
4m in average, >900m/s
Large Footprint, No Isolated
Foundations for Roofs etc.
Poisson’s Ratio = 0.48
Shale/Mudstone,
1100-1200 m/s
www.ekdahlgeo.se
4
Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015
Stability Management Starts with Newton
𝑚𝒙 =
𝑭
Vibration Isolation
Stable Supports
Issue
Oscillating Force
Floor Vibrations
Effect
Transfer of Force
Component Vibration
𝐹0 sin 𝜔𝑡
Vibration
Isolation
𝑚𝒙 + 𝑐𝒙 + 𝑘𝒙 = 𝐹0 sin 𝜔𝑡
FT sin 𝜔𝑡 + 𝜃
Stable
Supports
(Vibrations of the Mass)
x = X sin 𝜔𝑡 + 𝜃
𝑚𝒙 + 𝒄 𝒙 − 𝒚 + 𝒌(𝒙 − 𝒚) = 0
(Floor Vibrations)
y = Y sin 𝜔𝑡
5
Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015
Transmissibility
Transmissibility
4
160
Damping ζ=c/cc
3
140
0.0025
Phase Shift [deg]
Transmissibility
Phase Shift
180
0.1
0.15
2
0.25
0.375
0.5
1
120
100
80
60
40
1
20
0
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
0
1
Frequency ω/ωn
Vibration Isolation
Stable Supports
1/3 Octave value [mm]
10
6
10
10
10
10
Pos north, dir vert - design spektrum
17 Events i tidsperioden 02-07 Januar 2011
Rød linje - snittspektra
rms = 86.7 nm (5-100Hz), 86.8 nm (1-100Hz)
-3
Stable Supports
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German
Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015
10
10
0
10
1
1/3 Octave frequency [Hz]
10
2
2
3
Frequency ω/ωn
4
5
Transmissibility of a Mechanical System
FEA: 112Hz
Measurements: 95Hz
Transversal Measurements
Calculations by Karl Åhnberg
7
FEA: 119Hz
Measurements 100-120Hz
Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015
MAX IV Ring Magnet, U3
Measurements 39Hz
Calculations by Karl Åhnberg.
Measurements and analysis by
Curt Preissner and Jeffrey Collins,
APS, Argonne
8
Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015
FEA: 55Hz
Measurements: Curt Preissner, APS
9
Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015
Fixing Supports to the Floor
10
Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015
Examples Stable Supports/Structures
Calculations: Karl Åhnberg
11
Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015
Examples Vibration Isolation
12
Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015
FEM Calculations on Buildings
Calculations:
Peter Davidsson,
CreoDynamics.com
13
Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015
Some Other Thoughts
System
Low Inertia
High inertia
Stiff
Stable Supports,
Self-supporting Magnets
Internally Cooled Optics,
Facility Floors
Soft
Acoustical Damping?
Dissipation of Energy?
Vibration Isolating Systems,
Cooling Media Pulsations
● Viscoelastic Materials / Dynamic Stiffeners
● Tuned Oscillator (ω=constant)
● Active Control ( ω/ωn<0.5 or so)
● ...
14
Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015
Conclusions
● Stability Management is mainly about Reduction of Sensitivity
– Adding Stiffness
– Civil Engineering
– Stable Support/Structures/Mechanisms
● Vibration Isolation should be done at the Sources
● Predicting Vibration Levels by FEA is Difficult Business
● Measurements is a Good Tool for Adjusting Calculations
– Full Modal Analysis is Fantastic, when possible
– Transmissibility Measurements
● Non-discovered Land Somewhere? (At least to me)
– So Much Fun, So Little Time…
15
Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015
Thank You!
● With help from
– Karl Åhnberg, MAX IV
– Curt Preissner, APS
– Jeffrey Collins, APS
– Help and Fruitful Discussions with People at the Faculty of Engineering in Lund
– People from the Construction Company and its Consultants
16
Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015
Related documents