Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The MAX IV stability approach – From meters of clay to nanometers of optical stability. Brian Norsk Jensen, MAX IV Laboratory, 2015 Outline ● Aspects on Mechanical Stability – Correlated Motions – Reminder on Illustrative School Book Example ● The MAX IV Stability Criterion – Accelerator Stability leading to Vibration Level Goal – Design Goals for Facility Components ● Examples, Results and Practices – – – – Design and Characterization of Soft X-Ray Mirror Units Ring Magnet Stability Soft X-Ray Monochromator Other Examples ● Conclusions 2 Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015 Correlated Motions ● We are mainly concerned about Relative Displacements ● ● Sensitivity to Vibrations can be Reduced by increasing Correlation ● The MAX IV Floor is the “Backbone” of our Machines and Beamlines ● Stable Supports Ensure Correlated Motions (in Phase) ● 20nm-30nm RMS, 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐟>𝟓𝐇𝐳 (originating from storage ring considerations) Illustrations: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/17/Ship_wave_bending.svg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rotating_earth_axial_tiles_to_orbit.gif 3 Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015 The MAX IV “Boat” Shear Wave Velocities Concrete, 0.3m, >2400 m/s Stabilized UGM, 0.3m, 1300 m/s Low Baltic Clay Till, 2-8m layer, 250-300 m/s North-East Clay Till, 8-13m layer, 400-650 m/s Lime Stabilized Soil, 4m in average, >900m/s Large Footprint, No Isolated Foundations for Roofs etc. Poisson’s Ratio = 0.48 Shale/Mudstone, 1100-1200 m/s www.ekdahlgeo.se 4 Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015 Stability Management Starts with Newton 𝑚𝒙 = 𝑭 Vibration Isolation Stable Supports Issue Oscillating Force Floor Vibrations Effect Transfer of Force Component Vibration 𝐹0 sin 𝜔𝑡 Vibration Isolation 𝑚𝒙 + 𝑐𝒙 + 𝑘𝒙 = 𝐹0 sin 𝜔𝑡 FT sin 𝜔𝑡 + 𝜃 Stable Supports (Vibrations of the Mass) x = X sin 𝜔𝑡 + 𝜃 𝑚𝒙 + 𝒄 𝒙 − 𝒚 + 𝒌(𝒙 − 𝒚) = 0 (Floor Vibrations) y = Y sin 𝜔𝑡 5 Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015 Transmissibility Transmissibility 4 160 Damping ζ=c/cc 3 140 0.0025 Phase Shift [deg] Transmissibility Phase Shift 180 0.1 0.15 2 0.25 0.375 0.5 1 120 100 80 60 40 1 20 0 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 0 1 Frequency ω/ωn Vibration Isolation Stable Supports 1/3 Octave value [mm] 10 6 10 10 10 10 Pos north, dir vert - design spektrum 17 Events i tidsperioden 02-07 Januar 2011 Rød linje - snittspektra rms = 86.7 nm (5-100Hz), 86.8 nm (1-100Hz) -3 Stable Supports -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015 10 10 0 10 1 1/3 Octave frequency [Hz] 10 2 2 3 Frequency ω/ωn 4 5 Transmissibility of a Mechanical System FEA: 112Hz Measurements: 95Hz Transversal Measurements Calculations by Karl Åhnberg 7 FEA: 119Hz Measurements 100-120Hz Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015 MAX IV Ring Magnet, U3 Measurements 39Hz Calculations by Karl Åhnberg. Measurements and analysis by Curt Preissner and Jeffrey Collins, APS, Argonne 8 Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015 FEA: 55Hz Measurements: Curt Preissner, APS 9 Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015 Fixing Supports to the Floor 10 Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015 Examples Stable Supports/Structures Calculations: Karl Åhnberg 11 Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015 Examples Vibration Isolation 12 Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015 FEM Calculations on Buildings Calculations: Peter Davidsson, CreoDynamics.com 13 Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015 Some Other Thoughts System Low Inertia High inertia Stiff Stable Supports, Self-supporting Magnets Internally Cooled Optics, Facility Floors Soft Acoustical Damping? Dissipation of Energy? Vibration Isolating Systems, Cooling Media Pulsations ● Viscoelastic Materials / Dynamic Stiffeners ● Tuned Oscillator (ω=constant) ● Active Control ( ω/ωn<0.5 or so) ● ... 14 Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015 Conclusions ● Stability Management is mainly about Reduction of Sensitivity – Adding Stiffness – Civil Engineering – Stable Support/Structures/Mechanisms ● Vibration Isolation should be done at the Sources ● Predicting Vibration Levels by FEA is Difficult Business ● Measurements is a Good Tool for Adjusting Calculations – Full Modal Analysis is Fantastic, when possible – Transmissibility Measurements ● Non-discovered Land Somewhere? (At least to me) – So Much Fun, So Little Time… 15 Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015 Thank You! ● With help from – Karl Åhnberg, MAX IV – Curt Preissner, APS – Jeffrey Collins, APS – Help and Fruitful Discussions with People at the Faculty of Engineering in Lund – People from the Construction Company and its Consultants 16 Brian Norsk Jensen, 2nd Swedish-German Workshop on X-Ray Optics, Berlin 28-30 April 2015