* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Presentation on climate science
Myron Ebell wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Michael E. Mann wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit email controversy wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
AEF CONFERENCE NOTES FROM PROFESSOR GARTH PALTRIDGE Professor Paltridge talked first about the very real possibility that 100-year forecasts of the average rainfall over areas as small as the continent of Australia may be inherently impossible. In that context, it is very likely that the forecasts of a much dryer SE Australia supplied to Professor Garnaut by CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology are no better than guesswork. And so therefore would be Professor Garnaut's economic forecasts of a 10% reduction in the standard of living of the average Australian. In any event, the mooted 10% reduction due to climate change, even if true, would be a reduction from a ‘base’ of an expected increase in standard of living over the next hundred years of 400%! Professor Paltridge talked a little about the concept of ‘tipping points’, which is often used these days as justification for immediate action on climate change. He explained that, while the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere may be increasing “exponentially” (i.e. faster and faster as the years go by), the response to CO2 increase is “logarithmic” – that is, the response gets less and less as the concentration of CO2 increases. The net result is that the actual impact of any climate change should be much the same for the next fifty years (say) as for the last 50 years, and the need for immediate action is not at all obvious. He talked as well about why it is that the whole concept of disastrous climate change has run so far and so fast when the science of the business is so uncertain. Basically he believes that it is because ‘doing something about climate change’ plays to so many other agendas – many of which may be good agendas in their own right, but should not be supported simply by overstatement of the case with regard to global warming. Another more difficult question is why the scientific community itself is prepared to put its overall reputation at risk in order to sell to the general population the disaster scenario of global warming. Professor Paltridge suggested that the concept of disastrous climate change arose originally because scientists are quite naturally more interested in studying phenomena in which something happens rather than phenomena in which nothing happens. In a field dominated by statistical analysis in which personal bias can sub-consciously influence the results of research, it was easy enough in earlier times, when the subject was not so important in the grand scheme of things, for the disaster theory to gain traction. Once that had happened, and the subject became immensely politically correct, it was (and still is) almost impossible for scientists to do what they are paid to do – namely, to be sceptical about their own ideas. --------------------------------