memorandum
... the other party provides a written notice for the other party. 2. Until the termination of this MOU, both parties should respect and apply the set forth conditions that derive form this MOU, concerning the information and the documents exchanged before the date of its. ...
... the other party provides a written notice for the other party. 2. Until the termination of this MOU, both parties should respect and apply the set forth conditions that derive form this MOU, concerning the information and the documents exchanged before the date of its. ...
When Presidents Go Bad: - University of San Diego Home Pages
... What are high crimes and misdemeanors? “Impeachment conduct…may include the serious failure to discharge the affirmative duties imposed on the president by the Constitution. Unlike a criminal case, the cause for removal…may be based on his entire course of conduct in office…more than individual act ...
... What are high crimes and misdemeanors? “Impeachment conduct…may include the serious failure to discharge the affirmative duties imposed on the president by the Constitution. Unlike a criminal case, the cause for removal…may be based on his entire course of conduct in office…more than individual act ...
Transitional Justice: A Balanced Approach An Essay in answer to
... atrocities committed in the Holocaust during WWII under Nazi Germany. This inspired subsequent tribunals such as the ICTY, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) and the most significant and important being the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague after ...
... atrocities committed in the Holocaust during WWII under Nazi Germany. This inspired subsequent tribunals such as the ICTY, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) and the most significant and important being the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague after ...
powerpoint - FM Faculty Web Pages
... Deterrence Special or Specific Deterrence Punishing convicted offenders to deter THEM (The Individual) from committing any more crimes in the future General Deterrence The threat of punishment serves to prevent US (The members of the community) those who have not committed crimes from doing so ...
... Deterrence Special or Specific Deterrence Punishing convicted offenders to deter THEM (The Individual) from committing any more crimes in the future General Deterrence The threat of punishment serves to prevent US (The members of the community) those who have not committed crimes from doing so ...
Response to Ambassador Macharia Kamau`s Statement to the 69th
... Response to Ambassador Macharia Kamau’s Statement to the 69th Session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on 30th October 2014 Regarding the Report of the International Criminal Court (ICC) to the UNGA In a statement to the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) regarding a progress report ...
... Response to Ambassador Macharia Kamau’s Statement to the 69th Session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on 30th October 2014 Regarding the Report of the International Criminal Court (ICC) to the UNGA In a statement to the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) regarding a progress report ...
Europe, America, and the International Criminal Court
... the Court came into existence, the United States obtained from the Security Council an exemption for troops serving in U.N. operations – after threatening to veto all peacekeeping missions. The U.S. Congress passed, and President Bush signed, the American Servicemembers’ Protection Act, which forbid ...
... the Court came into existence, the United States obtained from the Security Council an exemption for troops serving in U.N. operations – after threatening to veto all peacekeeping missions. The U.S. Congress passed, and President Bush signed, the American Servicemembers’ Protection Act, which forbid ...
Role of Hate Speech in International Criminal Law
... Need to take into account the lack of consensus at the international level about what protection should be given to abusive language when it infringes upon the right to human dignity. Need to adequately address the power of propaganda to incite when it takes place in situations of extended discrimin ...
... Need to take into account the lack of consensus at the international level about what protection should be given to abusive language when it infringes upon the right to human dignity. Need to adequately address the power of propaganda to incite when it takes place in situations of extended discrimin ...
State jurisdiction: criminal jurisdiction
... Statute [of the ICTY] and the Rules provide little guidance. … In the absence of clarity in the Statute, Rules, and jurisprudence of the International Tribunal, the Appeals Chamber will seek guidance from national case law, where the issue at hand has often arisen, in order to determine State practi ...
... Statute [of the ICTY] and the Rules provide little guidance. … In the absence of clarity in the Statute, Rules, and jurisprudence of the International Tribunal, the Appeals Chamber will seek guidance from national case law, where the issue at hand has often arisen, in order to determine State practi ...
Making the perpetrators of mass sexual violence pay
... worth of best practices and lessons learned to inform national and international actors pursuing gender justice. There is a great need to understand the experience of sexual violence survivors and the legal processes following investigations in Africa, particularly given the existence of both contin ...
... worth of best practices and lessons learned to inform national and international actors pursuing gender justice. There is a great need to understand the experience of sexual violence survivors and the legal processes following investigations in Africa, particularly given the existence of both contin ...
Genocide Information Questions
... religious group with the intent to destroy the entire group, came into general usage only after World War II, when the full extent of the atrocities committed by the Nazi regime against the Jews of Europe during that conflict became known. In 1948, the United Nations declared genocide to be an inter ...
... religious group with the intent to destroy the entire group, came into general usage only after World War II, when the full extent of the atrocities committed by the Nazi regime against the Jews of Europe during that conflict became known. In 1948, the United Nations declared genocide to be an inter ...
hate crimes - TeacherWeb
... rape to begin with. Victimizing a person from a particular group that he professes to dislike heightens the excitement and increases the satisfaction. …There is nothing unique about the psychology of hate-crime perpetrators. They are ...
... rape to begin with. Victimizing a person from a particular group that he professes to dislike heightens the excitement and increases the satisfaction. …There is nothing unique about the psychology of hate-crime perpetrators. They are ...
National criminal jurisdiction
... Treaties on terror acts: • States parties shall establish jurisdiction: - When the offence is committed in the territory of the state (or on a vessel or aircraft of that state) - When the offence is committed by a national of that state - Jurisdiction may also be established when the offence was di ...
... Treaties on terror acts: • States parties shall establish jurisdiction: - When the offence is committed in the territory of the state (or on a vessel or aircraft of that state) - When the offence is committed by a national of that state - Jurisdiction may also be established when the offence was di ...
1 - PERMANENT COUNCIL OF THE OEA/Ser.G ORGANIZATION OF
... He noted that the Office of the Prosecutor was in charge of preliminary examinations, which in many cases helped deter crimes; investigations, which were based on the quality of evidence and legal thought; and prosecution and appeals, areas in which the Court was busier than it had ever been. He sai ...
... He noted that the Office of the Prosecutor was in charge of preliminary examinations, which in many cases helped deter crimes; investigations, which were based on the quality of evidence and legal thought; and prosecution and appeals, areas in which the Court was busier than it had ever been. He sai ...
Oak Ridge Indicted as Crime against Peace
... Against these continuing violations of treaty law, we assert our human right to civil resistance. Furthermore we affirm as crucial the human right to be free from these crimes. The Nuremberg Principles not only prohibit such crimes but oblige those of us aware of the crime to act against it. “Compli ...
... Against these continuing violations of treaty law, we assert our human right to civil resistance. Furthermore we affirm as crucial the human right to be free from these crimes. The Nuremberg Principles not only prohibit such crimes but oblige those of us aware of the crime to act against it. “Compli ...
Genealogy of transitional justice
... Established in November 1994 by the United Nations Security Council, Resolution 955 To judge individuals responsible for the Rwandan Genocide and other serious violations of international law in Rwanda, or by Rwandan citizens in nearby states, btwn 1 January and 31 December 1994 Has finished 50 tria ...
... Established in November 1994 by the United Nations Security Council, Resolution 955 To judge individuals responsible for the Rwandan Genocide and other serious violations of international law in Rwanda, or by Rwandan citizens in nearby states, btwn 1 January and 31 December 1994 Has finished 50 tria ...
Managing Diversity: the ICC
... • Statute approved at UN Conference in Rome on June 15-17, 1998 • 60 ratifications reached April 1, 2002 • Rome Statute entered into force on July 1, 2002 ...
... • Statute approved at UN Conference in Rome on June 15-17, 1998 • 60 ratifications reached April 1, 2002 • Rome Statute entered into force on July 1, 2002 ...
Command responsibility
Command responsibility, sometimes referred to as the Yamashita standard or the Medina standard, and also known as superior responsibility, is the doctrine of hierarchical accountability in cases of war crimes committed during wartime.The term may also be used more broadly to refer to the duty to supervise subordinates, and liability for the failure to do so, both in government, military law, and with regard to corporations and trusts.The doctrine of ""command responsibility"" was established by the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 and was applied for the first time by the German Supreme Court at the Leipzig War Crimes Trials after World War I, in the 1921 trial of Emil Müller.The ""Yamashita standard"" is based upon the precedent set by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Japanese General Tomoyuki Yamashita. He was prosecuted in 1945, in a still controversial trial, for atrocities committed by troops under his command in the Philippines during the Pacific Theater of World War II. Yamashita was charged with ""unlawfully disregarding and failing to discharge his duty as a commander to control the acts of members of his command by permitting them to commit war crimes.""The ""Medina standard"" is based upon the 1971 prosecution of U.S. Army Captain Ernest Medina in connection with the My Lai Massacre during the Vietnam War. It holds that a commanding officer, being aware of a human rights violation or a war crime, will be held criminally liable when he does not take action. However, Medina was acquitted of all charges.